Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 22:15:1296273.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1296273. eCollection 2024.

Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 immunity after vaccination and breakthrough infection in rituximab-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients: a prospective cohort study

Affiliations

Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 immunity after vaccination and breakthrough infection in rituximab-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients: a prospective cohort study

Hassen Kared et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Background: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with B cell-depleting drugs induced limited seroconversion but robust cellular response. We aimed to document specific T and B cell immunity in response to vaccine booster doses and breakthrough infection (BTI).

Methods: We included 76 RA patients treated with rituximab who received up to four SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses or three doses plus BTI, in addition to vaccinated healthy donors (HD) and control patients treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). We quantified anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) Spike IgG, anti-nucleocapsid (NC) IgG, 92 circulating inflammatory proteins, Spike-binding B cells, and Spike-specific T cells along with comprehensive high-dimensional phenotyping and functional assays.

Findings: The time since the last rituximab infusion, persistent inflammation, and age were associated with the anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG seroconversion. The vaccine-elicited serological response was accompanied by an incomplete induction of peripheral Spike-specific memory B cells but occurred independently of T cell responses. Vaccine- and BTI-elicited cellular immunity was similar between RA and HD ex vivo in terms of frequency or phenotype of Spike-specific cytotoxic T cells and in vitro in terms of the functionality and differentiation profile of Spike-specific T cells.

Interpretation: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in RA can induce persistent effector T-cell responses that are reactivated by BTI. Paused rituximab medication allowed serological responses after a booster dose (D4), especially in RA with lower inflammation, enabling efficient humoral and cellular immunity after BTI, and contributed overall to the development of potential durable immunity.

Keywords: ACPA; B cell; COVID-19; T cell; breakthrough infection; mRNA vaccination; rheumatoid arthritis; rituximab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JV reports grants from the Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations. GG reports funding from the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Dr. Trygve Gythfeldt og frues forskningsfond, Karin Fossum Foundation, the Research Foundation at Diakonhjemmet Hospital, speakers’ bureaus from AbbVie, Galapagos, Pfizer, and Union Chimique Belge; and participation on advisory board of AbbVie, Galapagos, Pfizer, and Union Chimique Belge. LM reports funding from the KG Jebsen Foundation, support for infrastructure and biobanking from the University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, grants from the Coalition of Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, RCN Covid 312693, a KG Jebsen Foundation grant 19, and speakers bureaus from Novartis, and Cellgene. EH reports grants from The Research Council of Norway during the conduct of the study; and for the last 36 months outside of the submitted work: speaker/consultant fees from Pfizer, AbbVie, Gilead, UCB Pharma, Galapagos, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim. KJ reports speaker fees from BMS and Janssen. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Serological responses in rituximab-treated rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. (A) Serological response post-vaccination. Longitudinal IgG anti-RBD (BAU/mL) 1 month (m1) after dose 2 (D2) to dose 4 (D4) in patients (n = 65, 63, 55) with at least two samples. Median titer for RA D4 was 586 BAU/mL [IQR: 1–7,390]. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test; P-values are indicated. The P-values are indicated as *for p < 0.05 and ****p < 0.0001. (B) Serological response post-D4 of vaccine and rituximab therapy. IgG anti-RBD (BAU/mL) responses after D4 of the vaccine according to the time interval since the last rituximab infusion with a median of 288 days [IQR: 155–361] corresponding to 10 months (within the last 10 months in red or more than 10 months in blue) before vaccination. IQR of 74–20,726 BAU/mL for RA with more than 10 months and IQR of 1–2,814 BAU/mL for RA with recent therapy. (C) Serological response post-vaccination and anti-citrullinated protein auto-antibodies (ACPA). IgG anti-RBD (BAU/mL) in ACPA-negative [IQR: 1–4,911] and ACPA-positive RA [IQR: 86–10,079] were measured at D4. (D) Serological responses before and after breakthrough infections. The biplots show IgG anti-RBD (BAU/mL) vs. IgG anti-nucleocapsid (AU/mL) in patients and healthy donors (HD); the samples are sequential after dose 3 (D3) or D4. The IgG anti-nucleocapsid titer has an IQR of 7.5–22 and n = 12 for breakthrough infection (BTI) RA and an IQR of 10.7–22.5 and n = 54 for BTI HD. The P-values are indicated as *for p < 0.05, **for p < 0.01, and ****for p < 0.0001 (see also Supplementary Figure S1 for further analysis of serological responses and decay of specific IgG).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Humoral response in rituximab-treated rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients after vaccination and infection. (A) Identification of Spike- and RBD-binding B cells. The representative dot plots show B cells that bind both wild-type (WT) Spike and WT RBD (upper region, Spike+ RBD+) or WT Spike but not WT RBD (lower region, Spike+ RBD-). Examples are shown for two serological responder RA and two healthy donors (HD) 1 month after D2 and D3. (B) Quantification of Spike+ RBD+ vs. Spike+ RBDbinding B cells. Left: frequency of Spike-binding B cells Spike+ RBD+ or Spike+ RBD- 1 month after the vaccine in HD (D2-3) vs. rituximab-treated patients (D2-4). Right: relative distribution of Spike+ RBD+ vs. Spike+ RBD- binding B cells 1 month after vaccination in HD (D2-D3) and RA patients (D2-D4). Mann–Whitney test; two-tailed P-values <0.01 (**) and <0.001 (***). (C) Phenotype of Spike-binding B cells. Frequency of Spike-binding and total B cells expressing CD27, CD71, Blimp-1, or IRF-4 1 month after D2 and D3. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test, P-value with * for p < 0.05 and ** for p < 0.01. (D) WT or Omicron Spike- and RBD-binding B cells after breakthrough infection (BTI). Left panel: detection of cross-reactive CD19+ B cells that bind both Omicron (BA.1.1) Spike and WT Spike, upper region vs. only WT Spike (lower region, WT Spike+ BA.1.1 Spike-). Right panel: detection of CD19+ B cells that bind both Omicron and WT RBD (WT RBD+ BA1.1+), Omicron RBD only (WT RBD- BA1.1+), or WT RBD only (WT RBD+ BA1.1-). (E) Quantification of WT or Omicron Spike- and RBD-binding B cells after BTI. Distribution of Spike and RBD-binding B cells as shown in (D). For HD and RA, left, IQR [0.091%–0.16%] for WT Spike, IQR [0%–0.22%] for cross-reactive WT/BA.1.1 Spike; IQR [0.17%–0.34%] for RBD WT only, IQR [0%–0.074%] for RBD WT/BA.1.1, and IQR [0.41%–1.2%] for RBD BA1.1-only. Percentage of nucleocapsid-binding B cells, right, with IQR [1.4%–1.7%]. Mann–Whitney test; P-value non-significant. (F) Phenotype of SARS-CoV-2-specific B cells after BTI. Spike- and RBD-binding B cells with specificities as in (D). For Omicron BA1.1-only, cross-reactive (WT/BA.1.1) and WT-only Spike/RBD, or nucleocapsid. The heat plots show differentiation markers as indicated, clustered into a function: antibody-secreting cells (ASC), memory, and naïve (see also Supplementary Figure S3 for an in-depth analysis of B cell phenotypes and specificities).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cellular response in rituximab RA patients after vaccination and infection. (A) Functionality of SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells and serological response. Frequency of Spike-specific T cells after D2 in serological responder and non-responder RA. The frequency of response from unstimulated cells was subtracted as a non-specific background [see Supplementary Methods and (4, 21)]. Gated CD4 (left) and CD8 (right) T cell activation in response to Spike peptides in patients (after D2) vs. HD after D2 and D3. IQR [0.02%–0.20%] for Spike-specific CD4 T cells and IQR [0.09%–1%] for Spike-specific CD8 T cells in responder RA. Mann–Whitney two-tailed P-value with ** for p < 0.01 and *** for p < 0.001. (B) Functionality of SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells after D4-induced seroconversion. Frequency of Spike-specific T cells before (D3m1) and after (D4m1) serological response in RA. CD4 (left) and CD8 (right) T cell activation in response to Spike peptides in non-responder (NR) vs. responder (R) patients. IQR of Spike-specific CD4 T cell response for D3m1 [0.005%–0.095%] and IQR for D4m1 [0.0075%–0.15%]) for CD4 and IQR of Spike-specific CD8 T cell response for D3m1 [0.005%–0.095%] vs. D4m1 [0.005%–0.14%]. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test; P-value non-significant. (C) Detection and quantification of Spike-specific CD8 T cells in RA; the dot plot shows pre-/post-vaccination examples. MHC-Class I restricted dextramers and tetramers were used to identify ex vivo Spike-, CMV-, EBV-, and FLU-specific CD8 T cells. Left flow plots: example of the patient before vaccination and 1 month after D2, CMV: HLA-binding T cells (upper left region) vs. Spike: HLA-binding T cells (lower right region). Right scatterplot: frequency of T cells binding peptide: HLA after D2 in patients vs. controls. IQR [0.115%–0.81%], n = 61 for RA and IQR [0.08%–0.95%], n = 52 for HD. Mann–Whitney test; *** indicates p < 0.001. (D) Functionality of SARS-CoV-2 specific helper T cells after breakthrough infection (BTI) in patients. Frequencies of Spike-and non-Spike (M, N, O)-specific CD4 T cells are shown: red symbols, patients with PCR-documented BTI; blue dots, vaccinated only. (E) Quantification of Spike- and non-Spike-specific CD8 T cells in vaccinated RA after BTI. Peptide: HLA class I dextramers and tetramers were used to identify ex vivo Spike-, non-Spike, CMV-, EBV-, and FLU-specific CD8 T cells. Mann–Whitney test, P-value non-significant (see also Supplementary Figures S4 , S5 ).

References

    1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. (2020) 383:2603–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, Kotloff K, Frey S, Novak R, et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-coV-2 vaccine. New Engl J Med. (2020) 384:403–16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Friedman MA, Curtis JR, Winthrop KL. Impact of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs on vaccine immunogenicity in patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Ann Rheumatic Dis. (2021) 80:1255. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221244. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jyssum I, Kared H, Tran TT, Tveter AT, Provan SA, Sexton J, et al. Humoral and cellular immune responses to two and three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in rituximab-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective, cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. (2022) 4:e177–87. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00394-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jena A, Mishra S, Deepak P, Kumar MP, Sharma A, Patel YI, et al. Response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in immune mediated inflammatory diseases: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev. (2021) 21:102927. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102927. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types