Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb 22:15:1348186.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1348186. eCollection 2024.

Effect of environmental factors on seminal microbiome and impact on sperm quality

Affiliations
Review

Effect of environmental factors on seminal microbiome and impact on sperm quality

Filipe T Lira Neto et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Objective: This review provides a comprehensive overview of the existing research on the seminal microbiome and its association with male infertility, while also highlighting areas that warrant further investigation.

Methods: A narrative review was conducted, encompassing all relevant studies published between 1980-2023 on the male reproductive tract microbiome in humans. This review considered studies utilizing culture-based, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based, and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based methodologies to analyze the microbiome. Data extraction encompassed sample types (semen or testicular tissue), study designs, participant characteristics, employed techniques, and critical findings.

Results: We included 37 studies comprising 9,310 participants. Among these, 16 studies used culture-based methods, 16 utilized NGS, and five employed a combination of methods for microorganism identification. Notably, none of the studies assessed fungi or viruses. All NGS-based studies identified the presence of bacteria in all semen samples. Two notable characteristics of the seminal microbiome were observed: substantial variability in species composition among individuals and the formation of microbial communities with a dominant species. Studies examining the testicular microbiome revealed that the testicular compartment is not sterile. Interestingly, sexually active couples shared 56% of predominant genera, and among couples with positive cultures in both partners, 61% of them shared at least one genital pathogen. In couples with infertility of known causes, there was an overlap in bacterial composition between the seminal and vaginal microbiomes, featuring an increased prevalence of Staphylococcus and Streptococcus genera. Furthermore, the seminal microbiome had discernible effects on reproductive outcomes. However, bacteria in IVF culture media did not seem to impact pregnancy rates.

Conclusion: Existing literature underscores that various genera of bacteria colonize the male reproductive tract. These organisms do not exist independently; instead, they play a pivotal role in regulating functions and maintaining hemostasis. Future research should prioritize longitudinal and prospective studies and investigations into the influence of infertility causes and commonly prescribed medication to enhance our understanding of the seminal microbiota's role in reproductive health.

Keywords: male infertility; microbiome; microbiota composition; semen; spermatozoa; testicular microbiome; testis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer AG declared a shared affiliation with the author(s) FC, AC, CA to the handling editor at the time of review. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dominant microbiota phyla and genera in testicular tissue samples and semen analysis obtained by existing diagnostic methods: next-generation sequencing (NGS), culture, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dominant microbiota genera in fertile and infertile men, obtained by existing diagnostic methods: next-generation sequencing (NGS), culture, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dominant seminal microbiota genera associated with pregnancy success after assisted reproductive technology.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Dominant seminal microbiota genera associated with embryo quality.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Dominant seminal microbiota phyla or genera associated with fertility status and outcomes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sender R, Fuchs S, Milo R. Are we really vastly outnumbered? Revisiting the ratio of bacterial to host cells in humans. Cell. (2016) 164(3):337–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Altmäe S, Franasiak JM, Mändar R. The seminal microbiome in health and disease. Nat Rev Urol. (2019) 16(12):703–21. doi: 10.1038/s41585-019-0250-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang F, Aschenbrenner D, Yoo JY, Zuo T. The gut mycobiome in health, disease, and clinical applications in association with the gut bacterial microbiome assembly. Lancet Microbe (2022) 3(12):E969–E983. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00203-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woo PC, Lau SK, Teng JL, Tse H, Yuen KY. Then and now: use of 16S rDNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification and discovery of novel bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratories. Clin Microbiol Infect (2008) 14(10):908–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02070.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Methé AB, Nelson KE, Pop M, Creasy HH, Giglio MG, Huttenhower C. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature. (2012) 486(7402):215–21. doi: 10.1038/nature11209 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types