Etiology and Management of Recurrent and Persistent Hemifacial Spasm-A Single-Center Experience
- PMID: 38456708
- DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002894
Etiology and Management of Recurrent and Persistent Hemifacial Spasm-A Single-Center Experience
Abstract
Background and objectives: Despite a 90% success rate, microvascular decompression occasionally fails to resolve hemifacial spasm (HFS), necessitating revision surgery. We investigated recurrent cases to identify underlying causes.
Methods: We evaluated patients at our institution who underwent revision microvascular decompression because of recurrent or persistent HFS, assessing recurrence causes, decompression techniques, complications, and outcomes. Data considered included demographics, preoperative symptoms, disease duration, offending vessel, and magnetic resonance findings. Surgical notes and intraoperative videos were reviewed, and telephone interviews were conducted for recent outcomes.
Results: Out of our ongoing series of 493 patients, 43 patients (8.7%) required revision surgery with a patient cohort of 33 females and 10 males. The average symptom duration was 10 years. The median time between primary and revision surgery was 14 months. Thirteen patients (30.2%) underwent initial surgery elsewhere. Adhesions of Teflon pledgets to the facial nerve were the primary cause of nonresolution in 23 patients (53.5%), while in 13 (30.2%), a missed vascular compression was identified. Sixteen patients (37.2%) had sufficient decompression by removing the conflicting pledgets. During 10 revisions (23.3%), additional Teflon pledgets were necessary. After a median follow-up of 67 months after revision surgery, 27 patients (62.8%) reported complete spasm resolution. Six patients (14.0%) had a good outcome with over 90% reduction of their spasms, 3 patients (7.0%) stated a fair outcome (50% improvement), while 7 patients (16.3%) had no improvement.
Conclusion: According to our results, adhesions of Teflon to the facial nerve may cause HFS recurrence. Therefore, whenever possible, Teflon should be placed without nerve contact between the brainstem and the offending vessel. Using a sling or bridge technique seems to be beneficial because it leaves the facial nerve completely free. Persistent symptoms often result from missed offending vessels in the pontomedullary sulcus indicating the benefit of endoscopic inspection of this area with an endoscope.
Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Muscle pad interposition technique in microvascular decompression for primary hemifacial spasm: a single-center case series and systematic review.Neurosurg Focus. 2025 Sep 1;59(3):E7. doi: 10.3171/2025.6.FOCUS25432. Neurosurg Focus. 2025. PMID: 40889396
-
Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm involving a tortuous vertebral artery: a single-center 100-patient series with surgical nuances and literature review.Neurosurg Focus. 2025 Sep 1;59(3):E2. doi: 10.3171/2025.6.FOCUS25303. Neurosurg Focus. 2025. PMID: 40889385 Review.
-
Factors associated with persistent abnormal muscle responses in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm and prognostic analysis.Neurosurg Focus. 2025 Sep 1;59(3):E4. doi: 10.3171/2025.6.FOCUS25327. Neurosurg Focus. 2025. PMID: 40889376
-
Efficacy and safety of reoperation for residual or recurrent hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Oct 17;47(1):804. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03048-x. Neurosurg Rev. 2024. PMID: 39414678
-
The impact of perforating arterial branches on microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.Neurosurg Focus. 2025 Sep 1;59(3):E3. doi: 10.3171/2025.6.FOCUS25418. Neurosurg Focus. 2025. PMID: 40889384
Cited by
-
Endoscope-assisted microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm with a teflon bridge.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 May 30;166(1):239. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06142-7. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024. PMID: 38814504 Free PMC article.
-
Comments to "Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation as a Treatment for Hemifacial Spasm: Long-term Follow-up and Management of Recurrences".Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Jun 10;166(1):259. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06151-6. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024. PMID: 39984763 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Park CK, Lee SH, Park BJ. Surgical outcomes of revision microvascular decompression for persistent or recurrent hemifacial spasm after surgery: analysis of radiologic and intraoperative findings. World Neurosurg. 2019;131:e454-e459.
-
- Hughes MA, Branstetter BF, Taylor CT, et al. MRI findings in patients with a history of failed prior microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: how to image and where to look. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(4):768-773.
-
- Lee S, Park SK, Lee JA, Joo BE, Park K. Missed culprits in failed microvascular decompression surgery for hemifacial spasm and clinical outcomes of redo surgery. World Neurosurg. 2019;129:e627-e633.
-
- Liu J, Li F, Wu G, et al. Long-term retrospective analysis of re-do microvascular decompression in patients with hemifacial spasm. Front Neurol. 2021;12:687945.
-
- Zhao H, Zhang X, Tang YD, et al. Factors promoting a good outcome in a second microvascular decompression operation when hemifacial spasm is not relieved after the initial operation. World Neurosurg. 2017;98:872 e11-e872.e19.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources