Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 20;42(18):2196-2206.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01573. Epub 2024 Mar 8.

Using Tumor Marker Gene Variants to Improve the Diagnostic Accuracy of DUPAN-2 and Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 for Pancreatic Cancer

Affiliations

Using Tumor Marker Gene Variants to Improve the Diagnostic Accuracy of DUPAN-2 and Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 for Pancreatic Cancer

Yohei Ando et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Circulating carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels reflect FUT3 and FUT2 fucosyltransferase activity. Measuring the related glycan, DUPAN-2, can be useful in individuals unable to synthesize CA19-9. We hypothesized that similar to CA19-9, FUT functional groups determined by variants in FUT3 and FUT2 influence DUPAN-2 levels, and having tumor marker reference ranges for each functional group would improve diagnostic performance.

Materials and methods: Using a training/validation study design, FUT2/FUT3 genotypes were determined in 938 individuals from Johns Hopkins Hospital: 607 Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) study subjects with unremarkable pancreata and 331 with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Serum DUPAN-2 and CA19-9 levels were measured by immunoassay.

Results: In controls, three functional FUT groups were identified with significant differences in DUPAN-2 levels: FUT3-intact, FUT3-null/FUT2-intact, and FUT3-null/FUT2-null. DUPAN-2 training set diagnostic cutoffs for each FUT group yielded higher diagnostic sensitivity in the validation set for patients with stage I/II PDAC than uniform cutoffs (60.4% [95% CI, 50.2 to 70.0] v 39.8% [30.0 to 49.8]), at approximately 99% (96.7 to 99.6) specificity. Combining FUT/CA19-9 and FUT/DUPAN-2 tests yielded 78.4% (72.3 to 83.7) sensitivity for stage I/II PDAC, at 97.7% (95.3 to 99.1) specificity in the combined sets, with higher AUC (stage I/II: 0.960 v 0.935 for CA19-9 + DUPAN-2 without the FUT test; P < .001); for stage I PDAC, sensitivity was 62.0% (49.1 to 73.2; AUC, 0.919 v 0.883; P = .03). CA19-9 levels in FUT3-null/FUT2-null PDAC subjects were higher than in FUT3-null/FUT2-intact subjects (median/IQR; 24.9/57.4 v <1/2.3 U/mL; P = .0044). In a simulated CAPS cohort, AUC precision recall (AUCPR) scores were 0.51 for CA19-9 alone, 0.64 for FUT/CA19-9, 0.73 for CA19-9/DUPAN-2, and 0.84 for FUT/CA19-9/DUPAN-2.

Conclusion: Using a tumor marker gene test to individualize CA19-9 and DUPAN-2 reference ranges achieves high diagnostic performance for stage I/II pancreatic cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

Marcia Irene Canto

Honoraria: Castle Biosciences

Consulting or Advisory Role: Castle Biosciences, Bluestar Genomics

Research Funding: Pentax Medical Corporation (Inst), Endogastric Solutions (Inst), Lucid Diagnostics (Inst)

Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Royalties from UpToDate, online

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
The effect of FUT functional groups on CA19-9 and DUPAN-2 synthesis. Synthetic pathway for Lewis antigens and related molecules in subjects with (A) normal FUT2 and FUT3 function (as predicted by the gene sequencing); (B) FUT3± and FUT2-intact; FUT3± indicates heterozygous for a null variant (lower CA19-9 levels), FUT2-intact meaning at least one functional FUT2 allele; (C) FUT2-null/FUT3 not null (higher CA19-9 levels); (D) FUT3-null/FUT2-intact (absent CA19-9/higher DUPAN-2 levels); (E) FUT3-null/FUT2-null (absent CA19-9 levels/highest DUPAN-2 levels). CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
FUT functional group–stratified DUPAN-2 levels. (A) DUPAN-2 levels among controls classified into three functional FUT groups. In both the testing and validation set controls, DUPAN-2 levels differ significantly between each group. (B and C) Within each FUT group, DUPAN-2 levels are significantly higher among PDAC cases compared with controls (P < .05) in (B) the training set and (C) the validation set. The control box plots show the mean, and the 25th and the 75th percentile of values. Note that the y-axis scale is different for each group and the horizontal line at the 500 U/mL level indicates a change in the y-axis scale. PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Diagnostic performance of CA19-9 and DUPAN-2, alone and with FUT group classification. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for stage I PDAC of CA19-9 alone versus CA19-9 by FUT group determined by the (A) FUT TMGT, (B) DUPAN-2 alone versus DUPAN-2 by FUT group, and (C) CA19-9 and DUPAN-2 combined (either test-positive) without FUT group, versus by FUT group. (D-F) Stage I/II PDAC versus controls. FUT group defined by FUT2/3 gene variants. CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; TMGT, tumor marker gene test.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, et al. : Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 73:17-48, 2023 - PubMed
    1. Park W, Chawla A, O'Reilly EM: Pancreatic cancer: A review. JAMA 326:851-862, 2021 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strobel O, Neoptolemos J, Jäger D, et al. : Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 16:11-26, 2019 - PubMed
    1. Blackford AL, Canto MI, Klein AP, et al. : Recent trends in the incidence and survival of stage 1A pancreatic cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 112:1162-1169, 2020 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dbouk M, Katona BW, Brand RE, et al. : The multicenter cancer of pancreas screening study: Impact on stage and survival. J Clin Oncol 40:3257-3266, 2022 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances