Talar Neck Fractures With Associated Ipsilateral Foot and Ankle Fractures Have a Higher Risk of Avascular Necrosis
- PMID: 38457751
- DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002798
Talar Neck Fractures With Associated Ipsilateral Foot and Ankle Fractures Have a Higher Risk of Avascular Necrosis
Abstract
Objectives: To determine if talar neck fractures with concomitant ipsilateral foot and/or ankle fractures (TNIFAFs) are associated with higher rates of avascular necrosis (AVN) compared with isolated talar neck fractures (ITNs).
Design: Retrospective cohort.
Setting: Single level I trauma center.
Patient selection criteria: Skeletally mature patients who sustained talar neck fractures from January 2008 to January 2017 with at least 6-month follow-up. Based on radiographs at the time of injury, fractures were classified as ITN or TNIFAF and by Hawkins classification.
Outcome measures and comparisons: The primary outcome was the development of AVN based on follow-up radiographs, with secondary outcomes including nonunion and collapse.
Results: There were 115 patients who sustained talar neck fractures, with 63 (55%) in the ITN group and 52 (45%) in the TNIFAF group. In total, 63 patients (54.7%) were female with the mean age of 39 years (range, 17-85), and 111 fractures (96.5%) occurred secondary to high-energy mechanisms of injury. There were no significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between groups ( P > 0.05). Twenty-four patients (46%) developed AVN in the TNIFAF group compared with 19 patients (30%) in the ITN group ( P = 0.078). After adjusting for Hawkins classification and other variables, the odds of developing AVN was higher in the TNIFAF group compared with the ITN group [odds ratio, 2.43 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-5.84); ( P = 0.047)].
Conclusions: This study found a significantly higher likelihood of AVN in patients with talar neck fractures with concomitant ipsilateral foot and/or ankle fractures compared to those with isolated talar neck fractures after adjusting for Hawkins classification and other potential prognostic confounders.
Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Jordan RK, Bafna KR, Liu J, et al. Complications of talar neck fractures by Hawkins classification: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56:817–821.
-
- Dodd A, Lefaivre KA. Outcomes of talar neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29:210–215.
-
- Clare MP, Maloney PJ. Prevention of avascular necrosis with fractures of the talar neck. Foot Ankle Clin. 2019;24:47–56.
-
- Large TM, Adams MR, Loeffler BJ, et al. Posttraumatic avascular necrosis after proximal femur, proximal humerus, talar neck, and scaphoid fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27:794–805.
-
- Patel R, Van Bergeyk A, Pinney S. Are displaced talar neck fractures surgical emergencies? A survey of orthopaedic trauma experts. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:378–381.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
