Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May;43(5):1579-1589.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06930-7. Epub 2024 Mar 9.

Real-world evaluation of persistence, effectiveness and usage patterns of tofacitinib in treatment of psoriatic arthritis in Australia

Affiliations

Real-world evaluation of persistence, effectiveness and usage patterns of tofacitinib in treatment of psoriatic arthritis in Australia

Geoffrey Littlejohn et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2024 May.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe treatment patterns and persistence of tofacitinib, interleukin 17 inhibitors (IL-17Ai) and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods: Data from adult patients with PsA and who had received at least one prescription of tofacitinib, IL-17Ai or TNFi between May 2019 and September 2021 were sourced from the Australian OPAL dataset. Persistence, analysed via Kaplan-Meier methods, and propensity score matching between tofacitinib and bDMARD (IL-17Ai and TNFi) groups were conducted.

Results: Of 16,692 patients with PsA, 1486 (n = 406 tofacitinib, n = 416 IL-17Ai and n = 664 TNFi) were included. More females were in the tofacitinib group (75.4%) than in the IL-17Ai (61.1%) and TNFi (64.8%) groups. Overall, 19.2% of tofacitinib patients were first line, compared with 41.8% of IL-17Ai and 62.8% of TNFi patients. In the overall population, the median persistence was 16.5 months (95% CI 13.8 to 19.5 months), 17.7 months (95% CI 15.8 to 19.6 months) and 17.2 months (95% CI 14.9 to 20.5 months) in the tofacitinib, IL-17Ai and TNFi groups, respectively. Persistence was similar in the tofacitinib/IL-17Ai matched population; however, in the tofacitinib/TNFi matched population, persistence was longer in the tofacitinib group (18.7 months, 95% CI 15.6 to 21.4 months) compared with the TNFi group (12.2 months, 95% CI 19.9 to 14.9 months).

Conclusions: In this Australian real-world dataset, tofacitinib was more frequently used in later lines and among a slightly higher proportion of female patients than IL-17Ai or TNFi. Overall, treatment persistence was similar for tofacitinib, IL-17Ai and TNFi, but tofacitinib exhibited longer persistence than TNFi in a matched population. Key Points • This is the first, large real-world study from Australia investigating the demographics, treatment patterns and comparative treatment persistence of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated with tofacitinib and biologic disease-modifying drugs (bDMARDs). • The study suggests that tofacitinib is an effective intervention in PsA with at least comparable persistence to bDMARDs: tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and interleukin-17 A inhibitors (IL-17Ai).

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis; Real-world; Tofacitinib; Treatment persistence; bDMARDs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

COS and TS are employees of OPAL Rheumatology Ltd and declare no competing interests. JL and BB are independent statistical consultants, funded by OPAL. The following interests are declared for GL; Astra Zeneca, MF; AbbVie, Janssen, UCB, Pfizer and Lilly and PY; Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Celltrion, Pfizer, Sandoz. DW and HN are employees of Pfizer.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Treatment persistence in A overall population (unmatched), B overall population in first-line setting (unmatched), C tofacitinib/IL-17Ai matched and D tofacitinib/TNFi matched
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percentage of patients achieving DAS28(3)-CRP disease activity levels for A overall population (all eligible patients three groups, unmatched), B tofacitinib/IL-17Ai matched and C tofacitinib/TNFi matched (data at index, 3, 6, 9, 12 months)

References

    1. Gladman DD, Antoni C, Mease P, Clegg DO, Nash P. Psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(Suppl 2):ii14–7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.032482. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Husni ME, Betts KA, Griffith J, Song Y, Ganguli A. Benefit-risk trade-offs for treatment decisions in moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: focus on the patient perspective. Rheumatol Int. 2017;37(9):1423–1434. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3760-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bolt JW, van Ansenwoude CMJ, Hammoura I, van de Sande MG, van Baarsen LGM. Translational research studies unraveling the origins of psoriatic arthritis: moving beyond skin and joints. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:711823. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.711823. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ocampo DV, Gladman D (2019) Psoriatic arthritis. F1000Res 8. 10.12688/f1000research.19144.1 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sukhov A, Adamopoulos IE, Maverakis E. Interactions of the immune system with skin and bone tissue in psoriatic arthritis: a comprehensive review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2016;51(1):87–99. doi: 10.1007/s12016-016-8529-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources