Comparison of patient demographics and patient-specific risk factors for readmissions following open reduction and internal fixation for acetabular fractures
- PMID: 38459969
- DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-03862-5
Comparison of patient demographics and patient-specific risk factors for readmissions following open reduction and internal fixation for acetabular fractures
Abstract
Purpose: Acetabular fractures are highly complex injuries often resulting from high-energy trauma. The gold standard treatment for these injuries has become open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). The purpose of this study is to further this understanding and investigate how (1) patient demographics and (2) patient-specific risk factors affect 90-day readmission rates.
Methods: A retrospective, nationwide query of private insurance database from January 1st, 2010 to October 31st, 2020 was performed using ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes. Patients who underwent acetabular ORIF and were readmitted within 90 days following index procedure were included, patients who were not readmitted served as controls. Patients were divided by demographics and specific risk factors associated with readmission.
Results: The query yielded a total of 3942 patients. Age and sex were found to be non-significant contributing risk factors to 90-day readmissions. Data also showed that statistically significant comorbidities included arrhythmia, cerebrovascular disease, coagulopathy, fluid and electrolyte abnormalities, and pathologic weight loss.
Conclusion: This study illustrated how several patient-specific risk factors may contribute to increased 90-day readmission risk following acetabular ORIF. A heightened awareness of these comorbidities in patients requiring acetabular ORIF is required to improve patient outcomes and minimize rates of readmission. Further investigation is needed to improve patient outcomes, and increase awareness of potential post-operative complications in these higher-risk patient populations.
Keywords: 90-Day readmission rates; Acetabular fractures; ORIF; Patient specific risk factors.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Khoshbin A, Atrey A, Chaudhry H et al (2020) Mortality rate of geriatric acetabular fractures is high compared with hip fractures. A matched cohort study. J Orthop Trauma 34:424–428. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001758 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mauffrey C, Hao J, Cuellar DO et al (2014) The epidemiology and injury patterns of acetabular fractures: are the USA and China comparable? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3332–3337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3462-8 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Boelch SP, Jordan MC, Meffert RH, Jansen H (2017) Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total hip replacement for osteoporotic acetabular fractures: a retrospective clinical study. Int Orthop 41:1831–1837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3260-x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Boudissa M, Francony F, Kerschbaumer G et al (2017) Epidemiology and treatment of acetabular fractures in a level-1 trauma centre: retrospective study of 414 patients over 10 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103:335–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.01.004 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
