Comparative evaluation of hand and rotary file systems on dentinal microcrack formation during pulpectomy procedure in primary teeth: an in vitro study
- PMID: 38461490
- DOI: 10.1007/s40368-024-00863-0
Comparative evaluation of hand and rotary file systems on dentinal microcrack formation during pulpectomy procedure in primary teeth: an in vitro study
Abstract
Purpose: Pulpectomy can be used for the management of deep dentinal carious lesions in primary teeth which can be restored. Mechanical preparation of root canals can be performed using hand or NiTi rotary files. However, this may cause dentinal stress and consequently dentinal microcracks. Hence, the aim was comparative evaluation of hand and rotary file systems on dentinal microcrack formation during pulpectomy procedure in primary teeth.
Methods: 60 extracted primary molar teeth were selected comprising of 80 root canals. Simple random sampling was used to divide root canals into four groups (n = 20): Group A-Hedstrom file, Group B-Pro AF Baby Gold rotary, Group C-ProTaper Next rotary, and Group D-unprepared group. Assessment was conducted on presence or absence of microcracks using Chi square test (p < 0.05).
Results: The total number of microcracks in Group A: one (5%), Group B: four (20%), Group C: nine (45%) and Group D: zero (0%) which was statistically significant (p = 0.002). At cervical third, the number of microcracks seen with Group A: one (5%), Group B: zero (0%), Group C: five (25%) and Group D: zero (0%) (p = 0.005). At the middle third, the number of microcracks seen in Group A: zero (0%), Group B: four (20%), Group C: four (20%) and Group D: zero (0%) (p = 0.029).
Conclusion: The study concluded that dentinal microcracks are formed with both hand and rotary file systems in primary teeth. ProTaper Next showed significantly higher number of microcracks, followed by ProAF Baby Gold and H files.
Keywords: Dentinal microcrack; Primary molars; ProAF Baby Gold; ProTaper Next.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry.
Similar articles
-
Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file.J Endod. 2012 Feb;38(2):232-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.10.011. Epub 2011 Dec 5. J Endod. 2012. PMID: 22244643
-
Comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy and volumetric changes in pulpectomized primary molars using hand K-file, ProTaper rotary file, and Kedo-SG blue file: an in-vitro cone beam computed tomography analysis.J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Sep;48(5):95-101. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.108. Epub 2024 Sep 3. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024. PMID: 39275825
-
Occurrence of Dentinal Microcracks in Severely Curved Root Canals with ProTaper Universal, WaveOne, and ProTaper Next File Systems.J Endod. 2015 Nov;41(11):1875-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Sep 18. J Endod. 2015. PMID: 26386948
-
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of the Pro AF Baby Gold and Kedo-S pediatric endodontic files for canal instrumentation, transportation, and centering ratio - A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2024 Apr 1;42(2):73-82. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_526_23. Epub 2024 Jun 28. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2024. PMID: 38957903
-
Paediatric Rotary Files and Dentinal Crack Formation in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2025 Jan 6;17(1):e77033. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77033. eCollection 2025 Jan. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 39917135 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Preparation With Different Instruments in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70180. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70180. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025. PMID: 40702914 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arias A, Lee YH, Peters CI, Gluskin AH, et al. Comparison of 2 canal preparation techniques in the induction of microcracks: a pilot study with cadaver mandibles. J Endod. 2014;40(7):982–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.003 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel–titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(1):77–8 (PMID:10633522). - PubMed
-
- Bhagyashree B, Rao D, Panwar S, Kothari N, et al. An in vitro comparative evaluation of dentinal crack formation caused by three different nickel–titanium rotary file systems in primary anterior teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2022;40(2):188–94. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_100_22 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bier CA, Shemesh H, Tanomaru-Filho M, Wesselink PR, et al. The ability of different nickel–titanium rotary instruments to induce dentinal damage during canal preparation. J Endod. 2009;35(2):236–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.021 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cassimiro M, Romeiro K, Gominho L, de Almeida A, et al. Effects of reciproc, protaper next and waveone gold on root canal walls: a stereomicroscope analysis. Iran Endod J. 2018;13(2):228–33. https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v13i2.16327 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources