Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety
- PMID: 38462252
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.02.009
Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety
Abstract
This review assessed the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic agents (prostaglandins, oxytocin, mifepristone, hyaluronidase, and nitric oxide donors) and mechanical methods (single- and double-balloon catheters, laminaria, membrane stripping, and amniotomy) and those generally considered under the rubric of complementary medicine (castor oil, nipple stimulation, sexual intercourse, herbal medicine, and acupuncture). A substantial body of published reports, including 2 large network meta-analyses, support the safety and efficacy of misoprostol (PGE1) when used for cervical ripening and labor induction. Misoprostol administered vaginally at doses of 50 μg has the highest probability of achieving vaginal delivery within 24 hours. Regardless of dosing, route, and schedule of administration, when used for cervical ripening and labor induction, prostaglandin E2 seems to have similar efficacy in decreasing cesarean delivery rates. Globally, although oxytocin represents the most widely used pharmacologic agent for labor induction, its effectiveness is highly dependent on parity and cervical status. Oxytocin is more effective than expectant management in inducing labor, and the efficacy of oxytocin is enhanced when combined with amniotomy. However, prostaglandins administered vaginally or intracervically are more effective in inducing labor than oxytocin. A single 200-mg oral tablet of mifepristone seems to represent the lowest effective dose for cervical ripening. The bulk of the literature assessing relaxin suggests this agent has limited benefit when used for this indication. Although intracervical injection of hyaluronidase may cause cervical ripening, the need for intracervical administration has limited the use of this agent. Concerning the vaginal administration of nitric oxide donors, including isosorbide mononitrate, isosorbide, nitroglycerin, and sodium nitroprusside, the higher incidence of side effects with these agents has limited their use. A synthetic hygroscopic cervical dilator has been found to be effective for preinduction cervical ripening. Although a pharmacologic agent may be administered after the use of the synthetic hygroscopic dilator, in an attempt to reduce the interval to vaginal delivery, concomitant use of mechanical and pharmacologic methods is being explored. Combining the use of a single-balloon catheter with dinoprostone, misoprostol, or oxytocin enhances the efficacy of these pharmacologic agents in cervical ripening and labor induction. The efficacy of single- and double-balloon catheters in cervical ripening and labor induction seems similar. To date, the combination of misoprostol with an intracervical catheter seems to be the best approach when balancing delivery times with safety. Although complementary methods are occasionally used by patients, given the lack of data documenting their efficacy and safety, these methods are rarely used in hospital settings.
Keywords: Dilapan-S; Foley catheter; acupuncture; amniotomy; castor oil; cervical ripening; dinoprostone; double-balloon catheter; grand multiparity; herbal supplements; hyaluronidase; hygroscopic cervical dilator; labor induction; mechanical; membrane stripping; membrane sweep; mifepristone; misoprostol; nipple stimulation; nitric oxide; oxytocin; pharmacologic; prostaglandins; relaxin; review; sexual intercourse; single-balloon catheter; twins.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter combined with a single dose of vaginal misoprostol tablet or intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Feb;42(2):232-238. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1904227. Epub 2021 May 24. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. PMID: 34027782 Clinical Trial.
-
Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):743.e1-743.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 May 7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32387325
-
Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 May;39(4):461-467. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1534090. Epub 2019 Feb 12. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019. PMID: 30747025 Clinical Trial.
-
Mechanical methods for induction of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36996264 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor.Am Fam Physician. 2003 May 15;67(10):2123-8. Am Fam Physician. 2003. PMID: 12776961 Review.
Cited by
-
A comparative analysis of methods of preinduction cervical ripening and induction of labor in Poland and in Germany (Part II): maternal and neonatal outcomes.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07015-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 39871179 Free PMC article.
-
Inpatient vaginal dinoprostone vs outpatient balloon catheters for cervical ripening in induction of labor: An individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jun;104(6):1041-1055. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15092. Epub 2025 Mar 25. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025. PMID: 40134109 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparing Pre-Induction Ultrasound Parameters and the Bishop Score to Determine Whether Labor Induction Is Successful.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 12;60(7):1127. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071127. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 39064556 Free PMC article.
-
Marine Phytoplankton Bioactive Lipids and Their Perspectives in Clinical Inflammation.Mar Drugs. 2025 Feb 17;23(2):86. doi: 10.3390/md23020086. Mar Drugs. 2025. PMID: 39997210 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Role of Mifepristone in Cervical Maturation and Induction of Labor: A Narrative Review of the Literature.J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 8;14(12):4061. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124061. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40565807 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources