Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 7;9(1):e001159.
doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001159. eCollection 2024.

Failure rates of nonoperative management of low-grade splenic injuries with active extravasation: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study

Affiliations

Failure rates of nonoperative management of low-grade splenic injuries with active extravasation: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study

Kristen Spoor et al. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: There is little evidence guiding the management of grade I-II traumatic splenic injuries with contrast blush (CB). We aimed to analyze the failure rate of nonoperative management (NOM) of grade I-II splenic injuries with CB in hemodynamically stable patients.

Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study examining all grade I-II splenic injuries with CB was performed at 21 institutions from January 1, 2014, to October 31, 2019. Patients >18 years old with grade I or II splenic injury due to blunt trauma with CB on CT were included. The primary outcome was the failure of NOM requiring angioembolization/operation. We determined the failure rate of NOM for grade I versus grade II splenic injuries. We then performed bivariate comparisons of patients who failed NOM with those who did not.

Results: A total of 145 patients were included. Median Injury Severity Score was 17. The combined rate of failure for grade I-II injuries was 20.0%. There was no statistical difference in failure of NOM between grade I and II injuries with CB (18.2% vs 21.1%, p>0.05). Patients who failed NOM had an increased median hospital length of stay (p=0.024) and increased need for blood transfusion (p=0.004) and massive transfusion (p=0.030). Five patients (3.4%) died and 96 (66.2%) were discharged home, with no differences between those who failed and those who did not fail NOM (both p>0.05).

Conclusion: NOM of grade I-II splenic injuries with CB fails in 20% of patients.

Level of evidence: IV.

Keywords: abdominal injuries; spleen; treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram.

References

    1. Sclafani SJ. The role of angiographic hemostasis in salvage of the injured spleen. Radiology 1981;141:645–50. 10.1148/radiology.141.3.7029619 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sclafani SJ, Weisberg A, Scalea TM, Phillips TF, Duncan AO. Blunt splenic injuries: nonsurgical treatment with CT, arteriography, and transcatheter arterial embolization of the splenic artery. Radiology 1991;181:189–96. 10.1148/radiology.181.1.1887032 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peitzman AB, Heil B, Rivera L, Federle MB, Harbrecht BG, Clancy KD, Croce M, Enderson BL, Morris JA, Shatz D, et al. . Blunt splenic injury in adults: multi-institutional study of the Eastern association for the surgery of trauma. J Trauma 2000;49:177–87. 10.1097/00005373-200008000-00002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bee TK, Croce MA, Miller PR, Pritchard FE, Fabian and T. Failures of splenic nonoperative management: is the glass half empty or half full? J Trauma 2001;50:230–6. 10.1097/00005373-200102000-00007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watson GA, Hoffman MK, Peitzman AB. Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: what is new? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2015;41:219–28. 10.1007/s00068-015-0520-1 - DOI - PubMed