Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 23:15:1334701.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1334701. eCollection 2024.

Prevalence of inappropriateness of elemene injection for hospitalized cancer patients: a multicenter retrospective study

Affiliations

Prevalence of inappropriateness of elemene injection for hospitalized cancer patients: a multicenter retrospective study

Mingzheng Cen et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Background: Elemene injection could provide clinical benefit for the treatment of various cancers, but the clinical evidence is weak. Thus, its wide use in China has raised concerns about the appropriateness of its use. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the prevalence of inappropriateness of elemene injection for hospitalized cancer patients. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively included, and demographic characteristics were extracted from the hospital information systems. The inappropriateness of elemene injection use was assessed using the preset criteria, and the prevalence was calculated. Multivariate logistic analysis was applied to identify any factors associated with inappropriate use. Results: A total of 275 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 62 years, and 30.9% were females. The most common cancer was lung cancer (24.0%), and 68.2% of the patients were receiving chemotherapy. The overall prevalence of inappropriateness was 61.8%. The most common reason for inappropriateness was inappropriate indications, and the second was inappropriate doses. Age and oncological department were significant risk factors associated with inappropriate use, while lung cancer, liver cancer and admission to cardiothoracic surgery were associated with a low risk of inappropriate use. Conclusion: The prevalence of inappropriateness among hospitalized elemene injection users was high. More efforts, especially those to improve the appropriateness of indications, should be made to improve the rational use of elemene, as well as other complementary medicines. Physicians should take caution to avoid inappropriate use when prescribing drugs with limited clinical evidence.

Keywords: appropriateness; cancer; chemotherapy; elemene injection; rational.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Overall prevalence of inappropriateness of elemene injection use in hospitalized patients with cancer. Appropriate indication means elemene injection can only be used for approved types of cancers, which are limited to lung cancer, liver cancer, esophageal cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, brain cancer, metastatic tumors of bone, gastric cancer, malignant pleural effusion and ascites. Appropriate dose means elemene injection is administered intravenously at a dose of 352–528 mg every day. Caution ignored means elemene injection were used to patient with risk without evaluation. Patients with thrombocytopenia or bleeding risk should be carefully evaluated for the benefit and risk of elemene use.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ardoino I., Casula M., Molari G., Mucherino S., Orlando V., Menditto E., et al. (2022). Prescription appropriateness of drugs for peptic ulcer and gastro-esophageal reflux disease: baseline assessment in the LAPTOP-PPI cluster randomized trial. Front. Pharmacol. 13, 803809. 10.3389/fphar.2022.803809 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bagchi S., Yuan R., Engleman E. G. (2021). Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of cancer: clinical impact and mechanisms of response and resistance. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 16, 223–249. 10.1146/annurev-pathol-042020-042741 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bai Z., Yao C., Zhu J., Xie Y., Ye X. Y., Bai R., et al. (2021). Anti-tumor drug discovery based on natural product β-elemene: anti-tumor mechanisms and structural modification. Molecules 26, 1499. 10.3390/molecules26061499 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Butler A. M., Brown D. S., Durkin M. J., Sahrmann J. M., Nickel K. B., O'Neil C. A., et al. (2022). Erratum: association of inappropriate outpatient pediatric antibiotic prescriptions with adverse drug events and health care expenditures. JAMA Netw. Open 5, 2214153. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14153 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen P., Li X., Zhang R., Liu S., Xiang Y., Zhang M., et al. (2020). Combinative treatment of β-elemene and cetuximab is sensitive to KRAS mutant colorectal cancer cells by inducing ferroptosis and inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transformation. Theranostics 10, 5107–5119. 10.7150/thno.44705 - DOI - PMC - PubMed