Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy to generate pancreatic cancer organoids: Randomized trial
- PMID: 38464982
- PMCID: PMC10919996
- DOI: 10.1055/a-2257-3171
Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy to generate pancreatic cancer organoids: Randomized trial
Abstract
Background and study aims The prognosis for pancreatic cancer remains poor. Molecular diagnostics and customized therapies are becoming increasingly important in clinical routine. Patient-derived, predictive model systems such as organoids have the potential to substantially increase the depth of information from biopsy material by functional and molecular characterization. We compared the extent to which the use of fine-needle aspiration needles (FNA, 22G) or fine-needle biopsy needles (FNB, 22G) influences the generation of pancreatic cancer patient-derived organoids (PDOs) to establish endoscopic standards of organoid technology. Patients and methods Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided punctures by EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB of pancreatic masses highly suspicious for adenocarcinoma (detected by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging) were prospectively evaluated. Consecutive patients received EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB in a randomized order without the need to exchange the needle shaft (only the inner needle type (FNA/-B) was exchanged) between the passes. With each needle type, the specimens for histological analysis and for PDOs were obtained separately. Results Fifty patients were enrolled in the study. Histology revealed malignancy in 42 of 50 cases (84%). In total PDOs were generated from 17 patients (34%). Of these, nine were established by FNB only, two by FNA only, and six by both FNA and FNB. Histology revealed malignancy in 13 of 17 PDO cases (76%). In two histologically false-negative cases, PDOs could be established. Conclusions EUS-FNB was superior to EUS-FNA in terms of successful generation of PDOs, although it failed to show statistical significance.
Keywords: Endoscopic ultrasonography; Fine-needle aspiration/biopsy; Pancreas; Tissue diagnosis.
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Christoph Schlag received lecture and consulting fees from Olympus, Boston Scientific and Medtronic. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 29;15:122. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0352-9. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26419845 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3533-3539. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6075-6. Epub 2018 Feb 5. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29404729 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.Endoscopy. 2021 Apr;53(4):376-382. doi: 10.1055/a-1223-2171. Epub 2020 Aug 6. Endoscopy. 2021. PMID: 32767288 Clinical Trial.
-
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 25;12(12):2951. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122951. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36552957 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration vs fine needle biopsy for pancreatic masses, subepithelial lesions, and lymph nodes.World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 14;27(26):4194-4207. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i26.4194. World J Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 34326619 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Pancreatic 3D Organoids and Microfluidic Systems-Applicability and Utilization in Surgery: A Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 28;61(4):623. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040623. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40282914 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Establishing Pancreatic Cancer Organoids from EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy Specimens.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 18;17(4):692. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040692. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40002285 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A prospective comparative trial to determine the optimal number of EUS-guided fineneedle passes for successful organoid creation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Endosc Ultrasound. 2024 Nov-Dec;13(6):361-365. doi: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000098. Epub 2024 Dec 30. Endosc Ultrasound. 2024. PMID: 39802106 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Roser M, Ritchie H. Cancer. Our World Data. https://ourworldindata.org/cancer https://ourworldindata.org/cancer
-
- Ma J, Jemal A. The rise and fall of cancer mortality in the USA: why does pancreatic cancer not follow the trend? Future Oncol. 2013;9:917–919. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources