Intravenous alteplase in minor nondisabling ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 38465589
- PMCID: PMC11418417
- DOI: 10.1177/23969873241237312
Intravenous alteplase in minor nondisabling ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Minor ischemic stroke, defined as National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score of 0-5 on admission, represents half of all acute ischemic strokes. The role of intravenous alteplase (IVA) among patients with minor stroke is inconclusive; therefore, we evaluated clinical outcomes of these patients treated with or without IVA.
Materials and methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane library until August 1, 2023. Inclusion was restricted to the English literature of studies that reported on minor nondisabling stroke patients treated with or without IVA. Odds ratios (ORs) with their corresponding 95% CIs were utilized using a random-effects model. Efficacy outcomes included rates of excellent (modified Rankin scale [mRS] of 0-1) and good (mRS of 0-2) functional outcome at 90 days. The main safety outcome was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH).
Results: Five eligible studies, two RCTs and three observational studies, comprising 2764 patients (31.8% female) met inclusion criteria. IVA was administered to 1559 (56.4%) patients. Pooled analysis of the two RCTs revealed no difference between the two groups in terms of 90-days excellent functional outcomes (OR 0.76 [95% CI, 0.51-1.13]; I2 = 0%) and sICH rates (OR 3.76 [95% CI, 0.61-23.20]). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of good functional outcomes, 90-day mortality, and 90-day stroke recurrence.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis of minor nondisabling stroke suggests that IVA did not prove more beneficial compared to no-IVA.
Keywords: Stroke; minor; thrombolysis.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Xiong Y, Gu H, Zhao XQ, et al.. Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of varying definitions of minor stroke: from a large-scale nation-wide longitudinal registry. Stroke 2021; 52: 1253–1258. - PubMed
-
- Smith EE, Abdullah AR, Petkovska I, et al.. Poor outcomes in patients who do not receive intravenous tissue plasminogen activator because of mild or improving ischemic stroke. Stroke 2005; 36: 2497–2499. - PubMed
-
- Smith EE, Fonarow GC, Reeves MJ, et al.. Outcomes in mild or rapidly improving stroke not treated with intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator: findings from Get with the guidelines-stroke. Stroke 2011; 42: 3110–3115. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous