The Perceval Sutureless Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve: Evolution of Surgical Valve Technology
- PMID: 38465600
- PMCID: PMC11055413
- DOI: 10.1177/15569845241231989
The Perceval Sutureless Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve: Evolution of Surgical Valve Technology
Abstract
Objective: The surgical treatment of aortic stenosis continues to evolve, and sutureless aortic valve replacement (SUAVR) is an emerging technology. With the Perceval S (Corcym, London, UK) as the only true sutureless valve on the market, the objective of this review is to analyze the current literature on Perceval S. Focusing on valve design and deployment as well as applications of the technology for challenging pathology, clinical outcomes are assessed, including a comparison with transcatheter AVR (TAVR).
Methods: PubMed and MEDLINE were searched by 3 authors for studies analyzing SUAVR from inception to May 19, 2023.
Results: SUAVR facilitates minimally invasive surgery and offers an alternative strategy for patients with small aortic annuli. It also has a time-saving advantage for patients who require complex operations. SUAVR results in excellent long-term morbidity, mortality, durability, and hemodynamic function. In comparison with conventional surgical AVR (SAVR), SUAVR does have a greater risk of postoperative pacemaker implantation; however, increasing user experience and refinements in implantation technique have contributed to reductions in this outcome. SUAVR results in morbidity and mortality that is similar to rapid-deployment AVR. Midterm outcomes are superior to TAVR; however, further robust investigation into all of these comparisons is ultimately necessary.
Conclusions: SUAVR bridges the gap in technology between SAVR and TAVR. The application of this exciting technology will undoubtedly grow in the coming years, during which additional investigation is paramount to optimize preoperative planning, valve deployment, and reintervention strategies.
Keywords: minimally invasive aortic valve replacement; rapid deployment aortic valve replacement; sutureless aortic valve replacement.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Sutureless and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: When Rivals Become Allies.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Autumn;32(3):427-430. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 19. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 31330180
-
Outcomes of sutureless aortic valve replacement versus conventional aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement, updated systematic review, and meta-analysis.J Card Surg. 2021 Dec;36(12):4734-4742. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16044. Epub 2021 Oct 6. J Card Surg. 2021. PMID: 34617322
-
Sutureless versus Stented Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Randomized PERSIST-AVR Study Design.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;68(2):114-123. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675847. Epub 2018 Nov 29. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 30497085 Clinical Trial.
-
Surgical aortic valve replacement with new-generation bioprostheses: Sutureless versus rapid-deployment.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Feb;159(2):432-442.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.135. Epub 2019 May 11. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 31213376
-
Sutureless aortic bioprosthesis.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Jul 1;25(1):114-121. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx051. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017. PMID: 28369578 Review.
Cited by
-
Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement with Perceval Bioprosthesis Superior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Promising Option for the Gray-Zone of Aortic Valve Replacement Procedures-A State-of-the-Art Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Future Directions.J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 19;13(16):4887. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164887. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39201028 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Global, regional, and national burden of nonrheumatic calcific aortic valve disease based on GBD study 2021.Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 12;15(1):29464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14522-x. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40790322 Free PMC article.
-
Contemporary Management of the Aortic Valve-Narrative Review of an Evolving Landscape.J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 29;14(1):134. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010134. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39797217 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of Surgical Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Using the Perceval Sutureless Bioprosthesis Versus a Conventional Biological Valve.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Aug 13;12(8):308. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12080308. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025. PMID: 40863374 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis: Sutureless Versus Stented Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement.J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 21;14(16):5906. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165906. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40869734 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Roth GA Mensah GA and Fuster V.. The global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risks: a compass for global action. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76: 2980–2981. - PubMed
-
- Eveborn GW, Schirmer H, Heggelund G, et al.. The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. The Tromsø study. Heart 2013; 99: 396–400. - PubMed
-
- Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al.. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2021; 143: E72–E227. - PubMed
-
- Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al.. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 2187–2198. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous