Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 3:102:skae064.
doi: 10.1093/jas/skae064.

Efficacy of a novel multi-enzyme feed additive on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and gut microbiome of weanling pigs fed corn-wheat or wheat-barley-based diet

Affiliations

Efficacy of a novel multi-enzyme feed additive on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and gut microbiome of weanling pigs fed corn-wheat or wheat-barley-based diet

Ayodeji S Aderibigbe et al. J Anim Sci. .

Abstract

One-hundred-and-ninety-two weanling pigs (6.7 kg body weight) were used to evaluate the impact of a carbohydrases-protease enzyme complex (CPEC) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and gut microbiome. Pigs were assigned to one of the four dietary treatments for 42 d according to a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of diet type (low fiber [LF] or high fiber [HF]) and CPEC supplementation (0 or 170 mg/kg diet). The LF diet was prepared as corn-wheat-based diet while the HF diet was wheat-barley-based and contained wheat middlings and canola meal. Each dietary treatment consisted of 12 replicate pens (six replicates per gender) and four pigs per replicate pen. Over the 42-d period, there was no interaction between diet type and CPEC supplementation on growth performance indices of pigs. Dietary addition of CPEC improved (P < 0.05) the body weight of pigs at days 28 and 42 and the gain-to-feed ratio of pigs from days 0 to 14. During the entire experimental period, dietary CPEC supplementation improved (P < 0.05) the average daily gain and gain-to-feed ratio of pigs. There were interactions between diet type and CPEC supplementation on apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of dry matter (DM; P < 0.01), gross energy (GE; P < 0.01), and neutral detergent fiber (NDF; P < 0.05) at d 42. Dietary CPEC addition improved (P < 0.05) ATTD of DM, GE, and NDF in the HF diets. At day 43, dietary CPEC addition resulted in improved (P < 0.05) apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of NDF and interactions (P < 0.05) between diet type and CPEC supplementation on AID of DM and crude fiber. Alpha diversity indices including phylogenetic diversity and observed amplicon sequence variants of fecal microbiome increased (P < 0.05) by the addition of CPEC to the HF diets on day 42. An interaction (P < 0.05) between diet type and CPEC addition on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index and Unweighted UniFrac distances was observed on day 42. In conclusion, CPEC improved weanling pig performance and feed efficiency, especially in wheat-barley diets, while dietary fiber composition had a more significant impact on fecal microbial communities than CPEC administration. The results of this study underscores carbohydrase's potential to boost pig performance without major microbiome changes.

Keywords: carbohydrase; fiber; growth performance; gut microbiome; weanling pigs.

Plain language summary

There is a pressing need to enhance livestock production efficiency to meet the growing global demand for meat. Carbohydrases and proteases are enzymes typically added to swine diets to improve nutrient utilization, leading to better growth rates and feed efficiency. This ultimately contributes to sustainable and economically viable pig farming. However, more research is required to better understand how carbohydrases and proteases interact with different diet types to optimize dietary formulations, and how this may influence gut microbiome composition. In this study, 192 weaner pigs (~7 kg) were assigned to a low-fiber diet or a high-fiber diet. Each diet type was with or without a carbohydrases and protease multi-enzyme supplementation. The results showed that adding a multi-enzyme combination to the pigs’ diet significantly improved the pig’s performance, regardless of diet type. Improvement in nutrient digestibility was more pronounced in pigs fed the high-fiber diet and that dietary fiber had a greater influence on the composition of fecal microbes. In essence, the study demonstrates that the multi-enzyme can boost pig growth and feed efficiency in diets with varying fiber complexity without causing significant changes in their gut microbiome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Deepak Velayudhan and Ester Vinyeta are employees of Danisco Animal Nutrition and Health (IFF), which provided financial support for this study. Other authors disclose that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Alpha diversity indices of microbiome in feces from weanling pigs at day 28: Shannon index (A); evenness index (B); phylogenetic diversity (C); observed amplicon sequence variant (ASV; D). Dietary treatment consisted of two diet types (low fiber [LF] and high fiber [HF]) without or with the addition of carbohydrase-protease enzyme complex (CPEC) at 170 mg/kg of diet (n = 12; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; †P < 0.10).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Alpha diversity indices of microbiome in feces from weanling pigs at day 42: Shannon index (A); evenness index (B); phylogenetic diversity (C); observed amplicon sequence variant (ASV; D). Dietary treatment consisted of two diet types [low fiber (LF) and high fiber (HF)] without or with the addition of carbohydrase-protease enzyme complex (CPEC) at 170 mg/kg of diet (n = 12; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; †P < 0.10).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Principal coordinates (PC) plots for beta diversity of microbiome in feces from weanling pigs at day 14: Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index (A); unweighted UniFrac distances (B); weighted UniFrac distances (C). Dietary treatments consisted of two diet types (low fiber [LF] and high fiber [HF]) with the addition of carbohydrase-protease enzyme complex at 0 g/kg (LF—and HF −) or 170 mg/kg (LF + and HF +) to the diets (n = 12).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Principal coordinates (PC) plots for beta diversity of microbiome in feces from weanling pigs at day 28: Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index (A); unweighted UniFrac distances (B); weighted UniFrac distances (C). Dietary treatments consisted of two diet types (low fiber [LF] and high fiber [HF]) with the addition of carbohydrase-protease enzyme complex at 0 g/kg (LF—and HF −) or 170 mg/kg (LF + and HF +) to the diets (n = 12).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Principal coordinates (PC) plots for beta diversity of microbiome in feces from weanling pigs at day 42: Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index (A); unweighted UniFrac distances (B); weighted UniFrac distances (C). Dietary treatments consisted of two diet types (low fiber [LF] and high fiber [HF]) with the addition of carbohydrase-protease enzyme complex at 0 g/kg (LF—and HF -) or 170 mg/kg (LF + and HF +) to the diets (n = 12).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acosta, J. A., Stein H. H., and Patience J. F... 2020. Impact of increasing the levels of insoluble fiber and the method of diet formulation on measures of energy and nutrient digestibility in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 98:1–9. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa130 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adeola, O., and Cowieson A. J... 2011. Board-invited review: opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve nonruminant animal production. J. Anim. Sci. 89:3189–3218. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3715 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agyekum, A. K., Sands J. S., Regassa A., Kiarie E., Weihrauch D., Kim W. K., and Nyachoti C. M... 2015. Effect of supplementing a fibrous diet with a xylanase and β-glucanase blend on growth performance, intestinal glucose uptake, and transport-associated gene expression in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 93:3483–3493. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9027 - DOI - PubMed
    1. AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed.Arlington (VA): Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
    1. AOAC. 2006. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed.Arlington (VA): Association of Official Analytical Chemists.