Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 11;19(3):e0288887.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288887. eCollection 2024.

Effects of time management interventions on mental health and wellbeing factors: A protocol for a systematic review

Affiliations

Effects of time management interventions on mental health and wellbeing factors: A protocol for a systematic review

Anna Navin Young et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Poor employee mental health and wellbeing are highly prevalent and costly. Time-related factors such as work intensification and perceptions of time poverty or pressure pose risks to employee health and wellbeing. While reviews suggest that there are positive associations between time management behavior and wellbeing, there is limited rigorous and systematic research examining the effectiveness of time management interventions on wellbeing in the workplace. A thorough review is needed to synthesize time management interventions and their effectiveness to promote employee mental health and wellbeing.

Method: A systematic search will be conducted using the following databases: PsychINFO via OVID (1806-Present), Web of Science, Scopus via Elsevier (1976-Present), Academic Search Complete (EBSCO), Cochrane Library via Wiley (1992-Present), and MEDLINE via OVID (1946-Present). The review will include experimental and quasi-experimental studies that evaluate the effects of time management interventions on wellbeing outcomes on healthy adults in a workplace context. Only studies in English will be included. Two authors will independently perform the literature search, record screening, data extraction, and quality assessment of each study included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Data will be critically appraised using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tools. Depending on the data, a meta-analysis or a narrative synthesis will be conducted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed in the development of this protocol. The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD4202125715).

Discussion: This review will provide systematic evidence on the effects of time management interventions on wellbeing outcomes in the workplace. It will contribute to our understanding of how time management approaches may help to address growing concerns for employee mental health and wellbeing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization [Internet]. Mental health at work; c2022. [cited 2023 Jun 16]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-at-work.
    1. Current Priorities of the U.S. Surgeon General [Internet]. The U.S. Surgeon General’s framework for workplace mental health & well-being; c2022. [cited 2023 Jun 16]. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/priorities/workplace-well-being/index....
    1. Leclerc C, De Keulenaer F, & Belli S. OSH Pulse—Occupational safety and health in post-pandemic workplaces. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. 2022. Available from: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/summary-osh-pulse-occupational-sa....
    1. Green F. It’s been a hard day’s night: The concentration and intensification of work in late twentieth-century Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations. 2001;39(1):53–80. doi: 10.1111/1467-8543.0018 - DOI
    1. Mauno S, Herttalampi M, Minkkinen J, Feldt T, Kubicek B. Is work intensification bad for employees? A review of outcomes for employees over the last two decades. Work & Stress. 2022;37(1):100–125. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2022.2080778 - DOI