Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;27(3):e14395.
doi: 10.1111/ele.14395.

David versus Goliath: Early career researchers in an unethical publishing system

Aurore Receveur  1 , Jonathan Bonfanti  1 , Stephanie D'Agata  1 , Andrew J Helmstetter  1 , Nikki A Moore  1 , Brunno F Oliveira  1 , Cathleen Petit-Cailleux  1 , Erica Rievrs Borges  1 , Marieke Schultz  1 , Aaron N Sexton  1 , Devi Veytia  1
Affiliations

David versus Goliath: Early career researchers in an unethical publishing system

Aurore Receveur et al. Ecol Lett. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

The publish-or-perish culture in academia has catalysed the development of an unethical publishing system. This system is characterised by the proliferation of journals and publishers-unaffiliated with learned societies or universities-that maintain extremely large revenues and profit margins diverting funds away from the academic community. Early career researchers (ECRs) are particularly vulnerable to the consequences of this publishing system because of intersecting factors, including pressure to pursue high impact publications, rising publication costs and job insecurity. Moving towards a more ethical system requires that scientists advocate for structural change by making career choices that come with risks, many of which disproportionately impact ECRs. We illuminate major issues facing ECRs in Ecology and Evolution under the current publishing system, and propose a portfolio of actions to promote systemic change that can be implemented by ECRs and established researchers.

Keywords: early career researcher; ethics, academic publishing; funding; open access; publication system; publishing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abson, D.J., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., Newig, J., Schomerus, T., Vilsmaier, U. et al. (2017) Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio, 46, 30-39.
    1. Aczel, B., Szaszi, B. & Holcombe, A.O. (2021) A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers' time spent on peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 6, 1-8.
    1. Aspesi, C., Allen, N., Crow, R., Daugherty, S., Joseph, H., McArthur, J. et al. (2019) SPARC* landscape analysis: the changing academic publishing industry-implications for academic institutions. Washington: SPARC.
    1. Bohannon, J. (2013) Who's afraid of peer review? Science, 342, 60-65.
    1. DORA. (2012) San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. Available from: https://sfdora.org/read/

LinkOut - more resources