Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 11;14(1):5944.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56569-2.

The transcriptomic insight into the differential susceptibility of African Swine Fever in inbred pigs

Affiliations

The transcriptomic insight into the differential susceptibility of African Swine Fever in inbred pigs

Mohammad Hossein Banabazi et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) is a global threat to animal health and food security. ASF is typically controlled by strict biosecurity, rapid diagnosis, and culling of affected herds. Much progress has been made in developing modified live virus vaccines against ASF. There is host variation in response to ASF infection in the field and under controlled conditions. To better understand the dynamics underlying this host differential morbidity, whole transcriptome profiling was carried out in twelve immunized and five sham immunized pigs. Seventeen MHC homozygous inbred Large white Babraham pigs were sampled at three time points before and after the challenge. The changes in the transcriptome profiles of infected animals were surveyed over time. In addition, the immunization effect on the host response was studied as well among the contrasts of all protection subgroups. The results showed two promising candidate genes to distinguish between recovered and non-recovered pigs after infection with a virulent African swine fever virus (ASFV) pre-infection: HTRA3 and GFPT2 (padj < 0.05). Variant calling on the transcriptome assemblies showed a two-base pair insertion into the ACOX3 gene closely located to HTRA3 that may regulate its expression as a putative genomic variant for ASF. Several significant DGEs, enriched gene ontology (GO) terms, and KEGG pathways at 1 day and 7 days post-infection, compared to the pre-infection, indicate a significant inflammation response immediately after ASF infection. The presence of the virus was confirmed by the mapping of RNA-Seq reads on two whole viral genome sequences. This was concordant with a higher virus load in the non-recovered animals 7 days post-infection. There was no transcriptome signature on the immunization at pre-infection and 1 day post-infection. More samples and data from additional clinical trials may support these findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The PCA plot of all samples (A) and without the outlier (highlighted in red circle) sample (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The volcano graphs of the statistically significant DEGs (Red dots) between non-recovered vs. recovered pigs (padj < 0.05) on pre-infection (A), 1 day (B), and 7 days post-infection (C).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Venn diagram of the shared numbers of the statistically significant DEGs between recovered vs. non-recovered pigs (padj < 0.05) on pre-infection, 1 day, and 7 days post-infection.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The volcano graphs of the statistically significant DEGs (Red dots) between non-recovered pigs (padj < 0.05) 1 day (A) and 7 days (B) post-infection compared with pre-infection.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Venn diagram of the shared numbers of the statistically significant DEGs between non-recovered pigs (padj < 0.05) over time post-infection compared to pre-infection.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The volcano graphs of the statistically significant DEGs (Red dots) between non-protected vs. sham pigs (padj < 0.05) on pre-infection (A), 1 day (B), and 7 days post-infection (C).
Figure 7
Figure 7
The 2-bp insertion on the sequence of the ACOX3 gene located near to HTRA3 gene (highlighted in red box) was observed only in the recovered pigs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Salguero FJ. Comparative pathology and pathogenesis of African swine fever infection in swine. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00282. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cwynar P, Stojkov J, Wlazlak K. African swine fever status in Europe. Viruses. 2019;11:310. doi: 10.3390/v11040310. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pikalo J, Zani L, Hühr J, Beer M, Blome S. Pathogenesis of African swine fever in domestic pigs and European wild boar—Lessons learned from recent animal trials. Virus Res. 2019;271:197614. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2019.04.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. (WOAH), W. O. f. A. H. 35th Situation Report on African Swine Fever (ASF). (2023).
    1. Goatley LC, et al. Cellular and humoral immune responses after immunisation with low virulent african swine fever virus in the large white inbred Babraham line and outbred domestic pigs. Viruses. 2022 doi: 10.3390/v14071487. - DOI - PMC - PubMed