Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 24;39(3):181-195.
doi: 10.1093/mutage/geae005.

Effects of aflatoxin and fumonisin on gene expression of growth factors and inflammation-related genes in a human hepatocyte cell line

Affiliations

Effects of aflatoxin and fumonisin on gene expression of growth factors and inflammation-related genes in a human hepatocyte cell line

Hang Wu et al. Mutagenesis. .

Abstract

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and fumonisin B1 (FB1) are mycotoxins widely distributed in maize and maized-based products, often occurring together. The implications of co-exposure to aflatoxin and fumonsin for human health are numerous, but a particular concern is the potential of FB1 to modulate AFB1 hepatotoxicity. This study evaluated the toxicity of these mycotoxins, alone or combined, in a human non-tumorigenic liver cell line, HHL-16 cells, and assessed the effects of AFB1 and FB1 on expression of genes involved in immune and growth factor pathways. The results demonstrated that in HHL-16 cells, both AFB1 and FB1 had dose-dependent and time-dependent toxicity, and the combination of them showed a synergistic toxicity in the cells. Moreover, AFB1 caused upregulation of IL6, CCL20, and BMP2, and downregulation of NDP. In combination of AFB1 with FB1, gene expression levels of IL6 and BMP2 were significantly higher compared to individual FB1 treatment, and had a tendency to be higher than individual AFB1 treatment. This study shows that FB1 may increase the hepatoxicity of AFB1 through increasing the inflammatory response and disrupting cell growth pathways.

Keywords: HHL-16 cells; aflatoxin; fumonisin; gene expression; toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Single AFB1 (A) or FB1 (B) treatment on HHL-16 cells for 24 and 48 h. Control: untreated cells; D: DMSO treatments; A: AFB1 treatments; P: PBS treatment; F: FB1 treatment. DMSO and PBS treatments were normalized against the control group. AFB1 treatments were normalized against corresponding DMSO treatments (i.e. A1 against D1), and FB1 treatments were normalized against the PBS treatment. With the increasing of either AFB1/FB1 concentrations or treated time, the cell viability was decreased, so there were dose-dependent and time-dependent cytotoxicity of both AFB1 and FB1 in HHL-16 cells. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, and the results were repeated three times.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Combined treatment of AFB1 and FB1 on HHL-16 cells for 24 and 48 h. Control: untreated cells; D: DMSO treatment; P: PBS treatment; A: AFB1 treatment; F: FB1 treatment; PBS and DMSO treatment were normalized against control groups. Combined treatments were normalized against corresponding combined treatment of DMSO and PBS. Expected additive effect: the sum of the toxic effect of single AFB1 and FB1. Combined AFB1 and FB1 treatment has a synergistic effect on HHL-16 cells 24 and 48 h post the treatment, it is both dose-dependent and time-dependent manner. Data was presented as mean ± SE, and the results were repeated three times. (B) Combinatory effects of aflatoxin and fumonisin evaluated by the combination index (CI) theorem. Fa: fraction affected (Fa = 1 − inhibition of cell viability%)/100. CI < 1, =1, >1 represent for synergistic, additive, and antagonistic effects, respectively. A synergistic effect was observed in the combination of AFB1 and FB1 in HHL-16 cells.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Gene expression of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes in HHL-16 cells exposed to aflatoxin for 24 h. Control: untreated cells; D: DMSO treatment; A: aflatoxin treatment. ACTB: Beta-actine, a reference gene used for the normalization to CYP1A2 (A), CYP3A4 (B) and CYP3A5 (C). A significant increase of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 were observed in HHL-16 cells after aflatoxin treatment for 24 h. Although there is a tendency to be higher expression of CYP1A2, it did not reach significant level.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Heat map of gene expression fold change of several selected genes in growth factors pathway in HHL-16 cells exposed to single AFB1 (10 µg/ml) or single FB1 (50 µg/ml) for 24 h. A: AFB1 treatment; F: FB1 treatment. The colours represent the up-regulated (black) and down-regulated (white) genes compared to the control group, respectively.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Differential gene expression of candidate genes, IL6 (A), CCL20 (B), BMP2 (C), and NDP (D), involved in immune and growth factors pathways in HHL-16 cells exposed to AFB1 for 24 h. Control: untreated cells. D: DMSO treatments. A: AFB1 treatments. GAPDH and ACTB, two reference genes were used to normalize the gene expression of IL6, CCL20 and NDP. Dose-dependent increasing of IL6, CCL20 and BMP2, and dose-dependent decreasing of NDP were observed.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Differential gene expression of candidate genes, IL6 (A), CCL20 (B), BMP2 (C), and NDP (D), involved in immune and growth factors pathways in HHL-16 cells exposed to both AFB1 and FB1 for 24 h. Control: untreated cells. D: DMSO treatments. A: AFB1 treatments. F: FB1 treatments. GAPDH and ACTB, two reference genes were used to normalize the gene expression of IL6, CCL20, BMP2 and NDP. Dots, diagonal lines, crosshatch, and black columns represent the control, single AFB1, single FB1, and combined AFB1 and FB1 treatment, respectively. IL6 and BMP2 expression levels were significantly higher after the combined treatment of 5 µg/ml AFB1 and 100 µg/ml FB1 than 100 µg/ml FB1 treatment alone and had a tendency to be higher compared to the individual 5 µg/ml AFB1 treatment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sweeney MJ, Dobson ADW.. Mycotoxin production by Aspergillus, Fusarium and Penicillium species. Int J Food Microbiol 1998;43:141–58. - PubMed
    1. Omotayo OP, Omotayo AO, Mwanza M, et al.. Prevalence of mycotoxins and their consequences on human health. Toxicol Res 2019;35:1–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gourama H, Bullerman LB.. Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus: aflatoxigenic fungi of concern in foods and feeds: a review. J Food Prot 1995;58:1395–404. - PubMed
    1. Mutegi CK, Ngugi HK, Hendriks SL, et al.. Prevalence and factors associated with aflatoxin contamination of peanuts from Western Kenya. Int J Food Microbiol 2009;130:27–34. - PubMed
    1. Ankwasa EM, Francis I, Ahmad T.. Update on mycotoxin contamination of maize and peanuts in East African Community Countries. J Food Sci Nutr Ther 2021;7:1–10.

Publication types

MeSH terms