Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 28;10(5):e26507.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26507. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.

Unlocking Africa's potential: The transformative power of foreign direct investment for sustainable development

Affiliations

Unlocking Africa's potential: The transformative power of foreign direct investment for sustainable development

Benedict Arthur et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

In the context of developing economies, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has long been acknowledged for its potential to stimulate economic growth. However, with the evolving understanding of development encompassing not only economic prosperity but also environmental and social well-being, the impact of FDI on sustainable development has become a subject of increasing importance and complexity. To shed light on this multifaceted relationship, our study empirically investigates the causal link between FDI and sustainable development in a panel of 48 African economies spanning the period from 1990 to 2020. We employ a robust measure of sustainable development, Adjusted Net Savings (ANS), as well as an innovative Sustainable Economic Growth (SEG) index that encompasses the three core pillars of sustainable development. FDI is measured both as FDI net inflow as a percentage of GDP and as the stock of FDI as a proportion of GDP for robustness testing. Our analytical approach utilizes the GMM-PVAR model. Our findings reveal a noteworthy unidirectional negative causality running from foreign direct investment to sustainable development across African economies. Intriguingly, the magnitude of this adverse impact is more pronounced in low-income nations, while a favorable causal effect of FDI on sustainable development is observed in high-income countries within the region. Importantly, these results hold true across various measures of sustainable development and different metrics of foreign direct investment. As a result, our study offers valuable insights for policymakers in Africa and beyond. Recognizing the nuanced impact of FDI on sustainable development, we propose tailored policy recommendations that take into account the income level of countries to maximize the benefits of foreign investment while mitigating potential adverse effects. Moreover, we advocate for ongoing research and policy innovation to further align FDI with the broader goals of sustainable development on the African continent.

Keywords: Adjusted net savings; Foreign direct investment; GMM-PVAR; Sustainable development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have any competing interests.The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Technical roadmap.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Stability graph.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Impulse response function graph.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
[A-C]: Module stability for subsample income group analysis.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
[A-C]: Impulse response function for subsample analysis-income bracket.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
[A-C]: Impulse response function for subsample analysis-income bracket.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Paul J., Feliciano-Cestero M.M. Five decades of research on foreign direct investment by MNEs: an overview and research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 2021;124:800–812. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muhammad B., Khan M.K., Khan M.I., Khan S. Impact of foreign direct investment, natural resources, renewable energy consumption, and economic growth on environmental degradation: evidence from BRICS, developing, developed and global countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 2021;28:21789–21798. - PubMed
    1. Ahakwa I., Tackie E.A., Sarpong F.A., Korankye B., Ofori E.K., Odai L.A., Musah M. Revisiting the impact of trade openness on environmental sustainability in Belt and Road countries: a heterogeneous panel approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 2023:1–22. - PubMed
    1. Sarpong F.A., Wang J., Cobbinah B.B., Makwetta J.J., Chen J. The drivers of energy efficiency improvement among nine selected West African countries: a two-stage DEA methodology. Energy Strategy Rev. 2022;43
    1. Wang Q., Wang X., Li R. Does urbanization redefine the environmental Kuznets curve? An empirical analysis of 134 Countries. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022;76