Improving Nurse-Physician Bedside Communication Using a Patient Experience Quality Improvement Pilot Project at an Academic Medical Center
- PMID: 38469366
- PMCID: PMC10927320
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55976
Improving Nurse-Physician Bedside Communication Using a Patient Experience Quality Improvement Pilot Project at an Academic Medical Center
Abstract
Introduction Patient experience is a crucial aspect of healthcare delivery, and it encompasses various elements that contribute to a patient's perception of the care they receive. Patient satisfaction and patient experience are related but distinct concepts. Patient experience focuses on whether specific aspects of care occurred, while patient satisfaction gauges whether patient expectations were met. It goes beyond mere satisfaction and delves into the broader aspects of how patients interact with the healthcare system and the quality of those interactions, with health plans, doctors, nurses, and staff in various healthcare facilities. Other aspects highly valued by patients include elements such as timely access to care and information, good communication with the healthcare team, and friendly staff. Patient experience can influence both the healthcare and financial outcomes of healthcare facilities. It is well understood that positive patient experiences may lead to better care adherence, improved clinical outcomes, enhanced patient safety, and better care coordination. Payers, both public and private, have recognized the importance of patient experience. Improving patient experience benefits healthcare facilities financially by strengthening customer loyalty, building a positive reputation, increasing referrals, and reducing medical malpractice risk and staff turnover. Methodology A multidisciplinary retrospective quality improvement initiative was initiated to effectively improve nurse-physician communication and organizational outcomes in several hospital units. Results Using an innovative staff-developed and driven acronym, IMOMW (I'm on my way), the study demonstrated significant positive outcomes such as increased Epic documentation (Epic Systems Corporation, Verona, Wisconsin, United States) of physician and nursing rounding by 13%, a 10.5% rise in recommend facility net promoter score (NPS) patient experience survey scores, 13.4% increase in physician and nurse team communication, 5.4% increase in nursing communication, and a 5.3% increase in physician communication. Moreover, pilot units outperformed the control group consisting of medical-surgical units located in newer portions of the hospital. Conclusion This quality improvement study demonstrates improved interdisciplinary nurse-physician communication, Epic documentation, and patient experience scores. Further investigation is necessary to better understand the specific factors and/or processes that influence the sustainability of interventions that improve nurse-physician communication and patient experience.
Keywords: academic medical center; bedside rounding; hospital; hospital medicine; inpatient care; key performance indicators; net promotor score; nurse-physician communication; patient experience; patient satisfaction.
Copyright © 2024, Wang et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447009
-
Enhancing patient satisfaction and experience through bedside interdisciplinary rounds: a quality improvement study.BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Apr 21;14(2):e003314. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003314. BMJ Open Qual. 2025. PMID: 40258640 Free PMC article.
-
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019. Qatar Med J. 2019. PMID: 31763205 Free PMC article.
-
The recent evolution of patient care rounds in pediatric teaching hospitals in the United States and Canada.Hosp Pract (1995). 2021 Oct;49(sup1):431-436. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2021.1977561. Epub 2021 Sep 21. Hosp Pract (1995). 2021. PMID: 34488528 Review.
-
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33599282 Free PMC article.
References
-
- The effects of interdisciplinary bedside rounds on patient centeredness, quality of care, and team collaboration: a systematic review. Heip T, Van Hecke A, Malfait S, Van Biesen W, Eeckloo K. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8719516/ J Patient Saf. 2020;18:0–4. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: What is patient experience? [ Sep; 2023 ]. 2023. https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/patient-experience/index.html https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/patient-experience/index.html
-
- Physician behaviors associated with increased physician and nurse communication during bedside interdisciplinary rounds. Huang KX, Chen CK, Pessegueiro AM, et al. https://shmpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhm.13189. J Hosp Med. 2023;18:888–895. - PubMed
-
- What works: physician and nurse rounding improves patient satisfaction. [ Sep; 2023 ]. 2014. https://www.myamericannurse.com/nurse-physician-rounding-patient-satisfa... https://www.myamericannurse.com/nurse-physician-rounding-patient-satisfa...
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous