Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 1:126:126052.
doi: 10.6028/jres.126.052. eCollection 2021.

Inactivation of Pathogens in Air Using Ultraviolet Direct Irradiation Below Exposure Limits

Affiliations

Inactivation of Pathogens in Air Using Ultraviolet Direct Irradiation Below Exposure Limits

Gary R Allen et al. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. .

Abstract

A method is described for inactivation of pathogens, especially airborne pathogens, using ultraviolet (UV) radiation emitted directly into occupied spaces and exposing occupants to a dose below the accepted actinic exposure limit (EL). This method is referred to as direct irradiation below exposure limits, or DIBEL. It is demonstrated herein that low-intensity UV radiation below exposure limits can achieve high levels of equivalent air changes per hour (ACHeq) and can be an effective component of efforts to combat airborne pathogens such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). An ACHeq of 4 h-¹ is presently achievable over a continuous 8 h period for the SARS-CoV-2 virus with UV-C light-emitting diodes (LEDs) having peak wavelength at 275 nm, and future improvements in LED technology and optics are anticipated to enable improvements up to 150 h-¹ in the coming decade. For example, the actinic EL is 60 J/m² at 254 nm, and human coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2, have a UV dose required for 90 % inactivation of about 5 J/m² at 254 nm. Irradiation by 254 nm UV-C at the EL is expected to provide 90 % inactivation of these organisms in air in about 40 min when the UV-C is delivered at a constant irradiance over 8 h, or in about 5 min if the UV-C is delivered at a constant irradiance over 1 h. Since the irradiation is continuous, the inactivation of initial contaminants accumulates to 99 % and then 99.9 %, and it also immediately begins inactivating any newly introduced (e.g., exhaled) pathogens at the same rate throughout the 8 h period. The efficacy for inactivating airborne pathogens with DIBEL may be expressed in terms of ACHeq, which may be compared with conventional ventilation-based methods for air disinfection. DIBEL may be applied in addition to other disinfection methods, such as upper room UV germicidal irradiation, and mechanical ventilation and filtration. The ACHeq of the separate methods is additive, providing enhanced cumulative disinfection rates. Conventional air disinfection technologies have typical ACHeq values of about 1 h-¹ to 5 h-¹ and maximum practical values of about 20 h-¹. UV-C DIBEL currently provides ACHeq values that are typically about 1 h-¹ to 10 h-¹, thus either complementing, or potentially substituting for, conventional technologies. UV-C DIBEL protocols are forecast herein to evolve to >100 ACHeq in a few years, potentially surpassing conventional technologies. UV-A (315 nm to 400 nm) and/or UV-C (100 nm to 280 nm) DIBEL is also efficacious at inactivating pathogens on surfaces. The relatively simple installation, low acquisition and operating costs, and unobtrusive aesthetic of DIBEL using UV LEDs contribute value in a layered, multi-agent disinfection strategy.

Keywords: LED; SARS-CoV-2; UV-C; actinic; airborne; disinfection; exposure limits; germicidal; indoor air quality; light-emitting diodes; pathogen; ultraviolet; virus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Typical application of DIBEL technology in an occupied room.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Concentration of airborne pathogens vs. time for R = 1, 3, and 10 h−1.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Concentration of airborne pathogens vs. time for baseline case without (a) and with (b) air disinfection.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Concentration of airborne pathogens vs. time for baseline case without (a) and with (b) air disinfection.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Spectral weighting function for actinic UV hazard vs. wavelength from IEC 62471:2006 [5].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Downes A, Blount TP (1878) Researches on the effect of light upon bacteria and other organisms. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 26:488–500.
    1. Nobel Foundation (1903) Biography of Niels Ryberg Finsen. Available at http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1903/finsen-bio.html
    1. Kowalski W (2009) Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation Handbook: UVGI for Air and Surface Disinfection (Springer-Verlag, Berlin: ).
    1. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) (2006) TLVs® and BEIs® (ACGIH, Washington, D.C.). Available at https://www.acgih.org/TLV/
    1. International Electrotechnical Commission (2006) International Standard IEC 62471:2006—Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems (International Electrotechnical Commission, Central Secretariat, Brussels, Belgium). Available at https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7076

LinkOut - more resources