Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 13:18:1296161.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1296161. eCollection 2024.

Locus coeruleus features are linked to vagus nerve stimulation response in drug-resistant epilepsy

Affiliations

Locus coeruleus features are linked to vagus nerve stimulation response in drug-resistant epilepsy

Alexandre Berger et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

The locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system is thought to be involved in the clinical effects of vagus nerve stimulation. This system is known to prevent seizure development and induce long-term plastic changes, particularly with the release of norepinephrine in the hippocampus. However, the requisites to become responder to the therapy and the mechanisms of action are still under investigation. Using MRI, we assessed the structural and functional characteristics of the locus coeruleus and microstructural properties of locus coeruleus-hippocampus white matter tracts in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy responding or not to the therapy. Twenty-three drug-resistant epileptic patients with cervical vagus nerve stimulation were recruited for this pilot study, including 13 responders or partial responders and 10 non-responders. A dedicated structural MRI acquisition allowed in vivo localization of the locus coeruleus and computation of its contrast (an accepted marker of LC integrity). Locus coeruleus activity was estimated using functional MRI during an auditory oddball task. Finally, multi-shell diffusion MRI was used to estimate the structural properties of locus coeruleus-hippocampus tracts. These characteristics were compared between responders/partial responders and non-responders and their association with therapy duration was also explored. In patients with a better response to the therapy, trends toward a lower activity and a higher contrast were found in the left medial and right caudal portions of the locus coeruleus, respectively. An increased locus coeruleus contrast, bilaterally over its medial portions, correlated with duration of the treatment. Finally, a higher integrity of locus coeruleus-hippocampus connections was found in patients with a better response to the treatment. These new insights into the neurobiology of vagus nerve stimulation may provide novel markers of the response to the treatment and may reflect neuroplasticity effects occurring in the brain following the implantation.

Keywords: biomarker; epilepsy; locus coeruleus; magnetic resonance imaging; vagus nerve stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AB was an employee of Synergia Medical SA. The firm was not involved in the study design, data collection and analysis, interpretation of the data, the writing of the article, or the decision to submit it for publication. GD was employed by General Electric Healthcare. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Extraction of the LC contrast. (A) Registration of the LC slab to the structural T1-anatomical image (axial, sagittal and coronal views); (B) computation of the intersection of the LC masks of two independent raters; (C) subdivision of the LC into rostral—25 upper % (blue), medial—50 middle % (red), and caudal—25 lower % (green); (D) selection of the voxel with the highest intensity for each axial slice; (E) centering of a 5-voxel cross on the voxel with the highest intensity; (F) definition of a slice-corresponding reference region in the pons (axial view), and final 3D reference region (sagittal view).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
LC response to target stimuli in patients responding (or partially responding) and not responding to VNS treatment. Activity in the rostral, medial and caudal portions of the (A) left LC (all patients included), (B) right LC (all patients included), (C) left LC (only patients with a good accuracy to the task, i.e., > 90%) and (D) right LC (only patients with a good accuracy to the task, i.e., > 90%), in non-responders (NR) and responders (R)/partial responders (PR). Refer to text and Supplementary Material 3 for full statistical outputs of LM models.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Linear regressions between contrasts in LC subparts and therapy duration. Linear regressions for the rostral–medial and caudal left (blue circles), right (orange stars) and mean over left and right (green diamond) LC and therapy duration (expressed in months). Refer to Supplementary Material 3 for statistical output of the LM.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Tractography of the left LC-hippocampus connections in a representative subject. Orange: left locus coeruleus, purple: left hippocampus. The color of the tracts reflects the directionality of the fibers.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Integrity of LC-hippocampus connections in patients responding (or partially responding) and not responding to VNS treatment. First row: Boxplots showing the difference in diffusion metrics in left LC-hippocampus connections between responders (R)/partial responders (PR) and non-responders (NR). Second row: Boxplots showing the difference in diffusion metrics in right LC-hippocampus connections between R/PR and NR. Refer to text and Supplementary Material 3 for full statistical outputs of LM models.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersson J. L., Sotiropoulos S. N. (2016). An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging. Neuroimage 125 1063–1078. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aston-Jones G., Ennis M., Pieribone V. A., Thompson Nickell W., Shipley M. T. (1986). The brain nucleus locus coeruleus: Restricted afferent control of a broad efferent. Science 234 734–737. 10.1126/science.3775363 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aston-Jones G., Shipley M. T., Chouvet G., Ennis M., van Bockstaele E., Pieribone V., et al. (1991). Afferent regulation of locus coeruleus neurons: Anatomy, physiology and pharmacology. Prog. Brain Res. 88 47–75. - PubMed
    1. Beck D., de Lange A. M., Maximov I. I., Richard G., Andreassen O. A., Nordvik J. E., et al. (2021). White matter microstructure across the adult lifespan: A mixed longitudinal and cross-sectional study using advanced diffusion models and brain-age prediction. Neuroimage 224:117441. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117441 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bell T. R., Elman J. A., Beck A., Fennema-Notestine C., Gustavson D. E., Hagler D. J., et al. (2023). Rostral-middle locus coeruleus integrity and subjective cognitive decline in early old age. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 29 763–774. 10.1017/S1355617722000881 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources