Short-term personality development and early career success: Two longitudinal studies during the post-graduation transition
- PMID: 38469653
- DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12922
Short-term personality development and early career success: Two longitudinal studies during the post-graduation transition
Abstract
Objective: Investigate short-term personality development during the post-graduation transition.
Background: Prior research indicates that long-term personality development matters for employment outcomes. However, this evidence is primarily limited to multi-year longitudinal studies. This research switches the focus to personality changes during a shorter, impactful life transition.
Method: We examined how short-term personality development during the 14-month post-graduation transition relates to early career outcomes among two diverse samples of graduates from universities (N = 816) and community colleges (N = 567). We used latent growth curve models to examine associations between career outcomes measured 14 months after graduation with initial personality levels and personality changes.
Results: Results revealed that mean-level changes in personality were small and mostly negative. Moreover, individual differences in personality changes were not associated with career outcomes. However, initial levels of conscientiousness, emotional stability, and extraversion positively related to both subjective and objective career success. Initial levels of agreeableness were also positively related to subjective (but not objective) success.
Conclusions: Findings indicate that individual differences in personality trait levels at graduation are stronger predictors of early career success compared to short-term personality changes during the post-graduation transition. Taken together, these results help define the time sequence through which personality changes relate to career outcomes.
Keywords: career success; income; personality change; personality development; young adulthood.
© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Personality published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Arnett, J. J. (2009). The neglected 95%, a challenge to psychology's philosophy of science. American Psychologist, 64(6), 571–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016723
-
- Arshad, M., & Chung, J. M. (2022). Practical recommendations for considering culture, race, and ethnicity in personality psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 16(2), e12656. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12656
-
- Atherton, O. E., Sutin, A. R., Terracciano, A., & Robins, R. W. (2022). Stability and change in the big five personality traits: Findings from a longitudinal study of Mexican‐origin adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(2), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000385
-
- Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M., & Lindenberger, U. (1999). Lifespan psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 471–507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.471
-
- Baranski, E., Gray, J., Morse, P., & Dunlop, W. (2020). From desire to development? A multi‐sample, idiographic examination of volitional personality change. Journal of Research in Personality, 85, 103910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103910
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources