Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Mar;17(3):e016143.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.123.016143. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

Interaction of AI-Enabled Quantitative Coronary Plaque Volumes on Coronary CT Angiography, FFRCT, and Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis of the ADVANCE Registry

Affiliations
Observational Study

Interaction of AI-Enabled Quantitative Coronary Plaque Volumes on Coronary CT Angiography, FFRCT, and Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis of the ADVANCE Registry

James Dundas et al. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Luminal stenosis, computed tomography-derived fractional-flow reserve (FFRCT), and high-risk plaque features on coronary computed tomography angiography are all known to be associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The interactions between these variables, patient outcomes, and quantitative plaque volumes have not been previously described.

Methods: Patients with coronary computed tomography angiography (n=4430) and one-year outcome data from the international ADVANCE (Assessing Diagnostic Value of Noninvasive FFRCT in Coronary Care) registry underwent artificial intelligence-enabled quantitative coronary plaque analysis. Optimal cutoffs for coronary total plaque volume and each plaque subtype were derived using receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis. The resulting plaque volumes were adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, smoking status, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, luminal stenosis, distal FFRCT, and translesional delta-FFRCT. Median plaque volumes and optimal cutoffs for these adjusted variables were compared with major adverse cardiac events, late revascularization, a composite of the two, and cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction.

Results: At one year, 55 patients (1.2%) had experienced major adverse cardiac events, and 123 (2.8%) had undergone late revascularization (>90 days). Following adjustment for age, sex, risk factors, stenosis, and FFRCT, total plaque volume above the receiver-operator characteristic curve-derived optimal cutoff (total plaque volume >564 mm3) was associated with the major adverse cardiac event/late revascularization composite (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.515 [95% CI, 1.093-2.099]; P=0.0126), and both components. Total percent atheroma volume greater than the optimal cutoff was associated with both major adverse cardiac event/late revascularization (total percent atheroma volume >24.4%; hazard ratio, 2.046 [95% CI, 1.474-2.839]; P<0.0001) and cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction (total percent atheroma volume >37.17%, hazard ratio, 4.53 [95% CI, 1.943-10.576]; P=0.0005). Calcified, noncalcified, and low-attenuation percentage atheroma volumes above the optimal cutoff were associated with all adverse outcomes, although this relationship was not maintained for cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction in analyses stratified by median plaque volumes.

Conclusions: Analysis of the ADVANCE registry using artificial intelligence-enabled quantitative plaque analysis shows that total plaque volume is associated with one-year adverse clinical events, with incremental predictive value over luminal stenosis or abnormal physiology by FFRCT.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02499679.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; atherosclerotic plaque; cardiac death; computed tomography angiography; coronary artery disease; major adverse cardiac events; myocardial infarction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Patel has received research grants from HeartFlow, Bayer, Janssen, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; and has served on the advisory board for HeartFlow, Bayer, and Janssen. Dr Nørgaard has received unrestricted institutional research grants from Siemens and HeartFlow. Dr Fairbairn has served on the Speakers Bureau for HeartFlow. Dr Nieman has received institutional research support from Siemens Healthineers, HeartFlow, GE Healthcare, and Bayer Healthcare. Dr Hurwitz Koweek has received research support and speaking fees from HeartFlow and Siemens. Dr Pontone has received institutional research grant and honorarium as consultant/speaker from GE Healthcare, Bracco, Medtronic, Bayer, and HeartFlow. Dr Rabbat has served as a consultant for HeartFlow. Ms Mullen is an employee of and owns equity in HeartFlow. Dr De Bruyne has an institutional consulting relationship with Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, CathWorks, Siemens, GE Healthcare, and Coroventis Research; has received institutional research grants from Abbott Vascular, Coroventis Research, CathWorks, and Boston Scientific; and holds equities in Philips, Siemens, GE Healthcare, Edwards Lifesciences, HeartFlow, Opsens, and Celiad. Dr Rogers is employee of and owns equity in HeartFlow. Dr Leipsic has received an unrestricted research grant from GE Healthcare, has stock options and received consulting fees from HeartFlow and Circle CVI, and speaking fees from GE and Philips. Dr Ng is an employee of HeartFlow. The other authors report no conflicts.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data