Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul;134(1):31-42.
doi: 10.1111/bju.16311. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

Evolution of European prostate cancer screening protocols and summary of ongoing trials

Affiliations
Review

Evolution of European prostate cancer screening protocols and summary of ongoing trials

Meike J van Harten et al. BJU Int. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Population-based organised repeated screening for prostate cancer has been found to reduce disease-specific mortality, but with substantial overdiagnosis leading to overtreatment. Although only very few countries have implemented a screening programme on a national level, individual prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is common. This opportunistic testing may have little favourable impact, while stressing the side-effects. The classic early detection protocols as were state-of-the-art in the 1990s applied a PSA and digital rectal examination threshold for sextant systematic prostate biopsy, with a fixed interval for re-testing, and limited indication for expectant management. In the three decades since these trials were started, different important improvements have become available in the cascade of screening, indication for biopsy, and treatment. The main developed aspects include: better identification of individuals at risk (using early/baseline PSA, family history, and/or genetic profile), individualised re-testing interval, optimised and individualised starting and stopping age, with gradual invitation at a fixed age rather than invitation of a wider range of age groups, risk stratification for biopsy (using PSA density, risk calculator, magnetic resonance imaging, serum and urine biomarkers, or combinations/sequences), targeted biopsy, transperineal biopsy approach, active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer, and improved staging of disease. All these developments are suggested to decrease the side-effects of screening, while at least maintaining the advantages, but Level 1 evidence is lacking. The knowledge gained and new developments on early detection are being tested in different prospective screening trials throughout Europe. In addition, the European Union-funded PRostate cancer Awareness and Initiative for Screening in the European Union (PRAISE-U) project will compare and evaluate different screening pilots throughout Europe. Implementation and sustainability will also be addressed. Modern screening approaches may reduce the burden of the second most frequent cause of cancer-related death in European males, while minimising side-effects. Also, less efficacious opportunistic early detection may be indirectly reduced.

Keywords: Europe; developments; evolution; prostate cancer; protocols; screening; trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Europe's Beating Cancer Plan Communication from the commission to the European Parliament and the Council [Internet]. Available from: https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022‐02/eu_cancer‐plan_en_0.pdf
    1. European Association of Urology. PRAISE‐U: Personalised Risk Assessment in Screening Events‐UroWeb. Available from: https://uroweb.org/praise‐u
    1. Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ et al. Prostate‐cancer mortality at 11 years of follow‐up. New Engl J Med 2012; 366: 981–990
    1. Draisma G, Boer R, Otto SJ et al. Lead times and Overdetection due to prostate‐specific antigen screening: estimates from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. JNCI J National Cancer Institute 2003; 95: 868–878
    1. Frånlund M, Månsson M, Godtman RA et al. Results from 22 years of Followup in the Göteborg randomized population‐based prostate cancer screening trial. J Urol 2022; 208: 292–300

Substances