Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 12;19(3):e0300485.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300485. eCollection 2024.

Constructed wetland as a green remediation technology for the treatment of wastewater from underground coal gasification process

Łukasz Jałowiecki  1 , Aleksandra Strugała-Wilczek  2 , Katarzyna Ponikiewska  2 , Jacek Borgulat  1 , Grażyna Płaza  1   3 , Krzysztof Stańczyk  2
Affiliations

Constructed wetland as a green remediation technology for the treatment of wastewater from underground coal gasification process

Łukasz Jałowiecki et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The wastewater from underground coal gasification (UCG) process has extremely complex composition and high concentrations of toxic and refractory compounds including phenolics, aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, ammonia, cyanides, hazardous metals and metalloids. So, the development of biological processes for treating UCG wastewater poses a serious challenge in the sustainable coal industry. The aim of the study was to develop an innovative and efficient wetland construction technology suitable for a treatment of UCG wastewater using available and low-cost media. During the bioremediation process the toxicity of the raw wastewater decreased significantly between 74%-99%. The toxicity units (TU) ranged from values corresponding to very high acute toxic for raw wastewater to non-toxic for effluents from wetland columns after 60 days of the experiment. The toxicity results correlated with the decrease of some organic and inorganic compounds such as phenols, aromatic hydrocarbons, cyanides, metals and ammonia observed during the bioremediation process. The removal percentage of organic compounds like BTEX, PAHs and phenol was around 99% just after 14 days of treatment. A similar removal rate was indicated for cyanide and metals (Zn, Cr, Cd and Pb). Concluded, in order to effectively assess remediation technologies, it is desirable to consider combination of physicochemical parameters with ecotoxicity measurements. The present findings show that wetland remediation technology can be used to clean-up the heavily contaminated waters from the UCG process. Wetland technology as a nature-based solution has the potential to turn coal gasification wastewater into usable recycled water. It is economically and environmentally alternative treatment method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Scheme of the vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands (VSF CWs) used in the bioremediation experiment.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Change in the quotients of organic pollutant indicators in wastewater samples during bioremediation processes using CWs.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Changes in the individual BTEX compounds over the time of bioremediation.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Changes in the individual PAHs compounds over the time of bioremediation.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Dependence between selected physicochemical parameters and toxicity over bioremediation time evaluated by PCA analysis.
Numbers above icons indicate day of measurement. Abbreviations: BTEX- volatile aromatic hydrocarbons, CN--cyanides, HM- heavy metals including metalloids (As and Sb), PAHs- polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Phenind- phenol index, TU—toxicity unit.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kapusta K, Stańczyk K. Chemical and toxicological evaluation of underground coal gasification (UCG) effluents. The coal rank effect. Ecotoxol Environ Safety, 2015; 112, 105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.10.038 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pankiewicz-Sperka M, Kapusta K, Basa W, Stolecka K. Characteristics of Water Contaminants from Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) Process—Effect of Coal Properties and Gasification Pressure. Energies. 2021; 14, 6533. doi: 10.3390/en14206533 - DOI
    1. Liu SQ, Li JG Mei M, Dong DL. Groundwater pollution from underground coal gasification. J China Univ Mining Technol. 2007; 17, 467–472. doi: 10.1016/S1006-1266(07)60127-8 - DOI
    1. Kapusta K, Stańczyk K, Wiatowski M, Chećko J. Environmental aspects of a field-scale underground coal gasification trial in a shallow coal seam at the Experimental Mine “Barbara” in Poland. Fuel. 2013; 113, 196–208. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.015 - DOI
    1. Kwiecińska A, Lajnert R, Bigda R. Coke oven wastewater—formation, treatment and utilization methods—A review. Proceedings of ECOpole. 2017; 11. doi: 10.2429/proc.2017.11(1)002 - DOI