Consumer focus group testing with stakeholders to generate an enteral resuscitation training flipbook for primary health center and first-level hospital providers in Nepal
- PMID: 38472005
- PMCID: PMC11116054
- DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.02.008
Consumer focus group testing with stakeholders to generate an enteral resuscitation training flipbook for primary health center and first-level hospital providers in Nepal
Abstract
Introduction: Enteral resuscitation (EResus) is operationally advantageous to intravenous resuscitation for burn-injured patients in some low-resource settings. However, there is minimal guidance and no training materials for EResus tailored to non-burn care providers. We aimed to develop and consumer-test a training flipbook with doctors and nurses in Nepal to aid broader dissemination of this life-saving technique.
Materials and methods: We used individual cognitive interviews with Nepali (n = 12) and international (n = 4) burn care experts to define key elements of EResus and specific concepts for its operationalization at primary health centers and first-level hospitals in Nepal. Content, prototype illustrations, and wireframe layouts were developed and revised with the burn care experts. Subsequently, eight consumer testing focus groups with Nepali stakeholders (5-10 people each) were facilitated. Prompts were generated using the Questionnaire Appraisal System (QAS) framework. The flipbook was iteratively revised and tested based on consumer feedback organized according to the domains of clarity, assumptions, knowledge/memory, and sensitivity/bias.
Results and discussion: The flipbook elements were iterated until consumers made no additional requests for changes. Examples of consumer inputs included: clarity-minimize medical jargon, add shrunken organs and wilted plants to represent burn shock; assumptions-use locally representative figures, depict oral rehydration salts sachet instead of a graduated bottle; knowledge/memory-clarify complex topics, use Rule-of-9 s and depict approximately 20% total body surface area to indicate the threshold for resuscitation; sensitivity/bias-reduce anatomic illustration details (e.g. urinary catheter placement, body contours).
Conclusion: Stakeholder engagement, consumer testing, and iterative revision can generate knowledge translation products that reflect contextually appropriate education materials for inexperienced burn providers. The EResus Training Flipbook can be used in Nepal and adapted to other contexts to facilitate the implementation of EResus globally.
Keywords: Burn; Enteral resuscitation; Implementation; Infographic; Low- and middle-income countries; Medical Education.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd and International Society of Burns Injuries. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest None.
Figures













Similar articles
-
Barriers and facilitators to implementing enteral resuscitation for major burn injuries: Reflections from Nepalese care providers.Burns. 2025 Feb;51(1):107302. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.107302. Epub 2024 Oct 28. Burns. 2025. PMID: 39577105
-
Feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of enteral vs intravenous resuscitation for adults with major burn injuries in Nepal.Burns. 2025 Mar;51(2):107347. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.107347. Epub 2024 Dec 27. Burns. 2025. PMID: 39798346 Clinical Trial.
-
Perception and Practice among Community People and Health Service Providers on Care and Management of Burn Injuries in Nepal: A Qualitative Study.J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2019 Nov 13;17(3):315-319. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v17i3.1640. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2019. PMID: 31735924
-
Enteral Resuscitation: A Field-Expedient Treatment Strategy for Burn Shock during Wartime and in Other Austere Settings.Eur Burn J. 2024 Jan 18;5(1):23-37. doi: 10.3390/ebj5010003. Eur Burn J. 2024. PMID: 39600011 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Gyedu A et al., “Preferences for oral rehydration drinks among healthy individuals in Ghana: A single-blind, cross-sectional survey to inform implementation of an enterally based resuscitation protocol for burn injury.,” Burns J. Int. Soc. Burn Inj, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 820–829, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.05.016. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Davé DR, Nagarjan N, Canner JK, Kushner AL, and Stewart BT, “Rethinking burns for low & middle-income countries: Differing patterns of burn epidemiology, care seeking behavior, and outcomes across four countries.,” Burns J. Int. Soc. Burn Inj, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1228–1234, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.01.015. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hu S et al., “Pyruvate-enriched oral rehydration solution improved intestinal absorption of water and sodium during enteral resuscitation in burns,” Burns, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 693–701, 2014. - PubMed
-
- Díez-Gandía A, Ajenjo MA, Navalón AB, Fernández RB, Sanz AB, and Diez-Domingo J, “Palatability of oral rehydration solutions (ORS) in healthy 6 to 9 year-old children. A multicentre, randomised single blind clinical trial,” in Anales de Pediatria (Barcelona, Spain: 2003), 2009, pp. 111–115. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical