James Rachels and the morality of euthanasia
- PMID: 38472568
- DOI: 10.1007/s11017-024-09658-2
James Rachels and the morality of euthanasia
Abstract
My fundamental thesis is that Rachels dismisses the traditional Western account of the morality of killing without offering a viable replacement. In this regard, I will argue that the substitute account he offers is deficient in at least eight regards: (1) he fails to justify the foundational principle of utilitarianism, (2) he exposes preference utilitarianism to the same criticisms he lodges against classical utilitarianism, (3) he neglects to explain how precisely one performs the maximization procedure which preference utilitarianism requires, (4) his account of the sanctity of life is subject to the very criticism he levels against the traditional position, (5) he cannot justify the exceptions he makes to his interpretation of the sanctity of life, (6) his account could easily be used to justify murder, (7) his embrace of autonomy as an ethical principle undermines his preference utilitarianism, and (8) he cannot maintain the moral identification of acts of killing and letting die.
Keywords: Ethics of killing; James Rachels; Morality; Voluntary active euthanasia.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
References
-
- Smart, J.J.C. and Williams, Bernard. 1973. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Eds. J.J.C. Smart and Bernard Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
- Lyons, David. 1965. Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
- Glover, Jonathan. 1990. Utilitarianism and its Critics, 193–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
- Capaldi, Nicholas. 2004. John Stuart Mill: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
- Schultz, Bart. 2004. Henry Sidgwick—Eye of the Universe: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources