Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar 6;14(5):819.
doi: 10.3390/ani14050819.

Methods to Isolate Muscle Stem Cells for Cell-Based Cultured Meat Production: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Methods to Isolate Muscle Stem Cells for Cell-Based Cultured Meat Production: A Review

Jae-Hoon Lee et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Cultured meat production relies on various cell types, including muscle stem cells (MuSCs), embryonic stem cell lines, induced pluripotent cell lines, and naturally immortalized cell lines. MuSCs possess superior muscle differentiation capabilities compared to the other three cell lines, making them key for cultured meat development. Therefore, to produce cultured meat using MuSCs, they must first be effectively separated from muscles. At present, the methods used to isolate MuSCs from muscles include (1) the pre-plating method, using the ability of cells to adhere differently, which is a biological characteristic of MuSCs; (2) the density gradient centrifugation method, using the intrinsic density difference of cells, which is a physical characteristic of MuSCs; and (3) fluorescence- and magnetic-activated cell sorting methods, using the surface marker protein on the cell surface of MuSCs, which is a molecular characteristic of MuSCs. Further efficient and valuable methods for separating MuSCs are expected to be required as the cell-based cultured meat industry develops. Thus, we take a closer look at the four methods currently in use and discuss future development directions in this review.

Keywords: cell isolation; density gradient centrifugation; fluorescence- and magnetic-activated cell sorting; muscle stem cells; pre-plating.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Naraoka Y., Mabuchi Y., Kiuchi M., Kumagai K., Hisamatsu D., Yoneyama Y., Takebe T., Akazawa C. Quality Control of Stem Cell-Based Cultured Meat According to Specific Differentiation Abilities. Cells. 2024;13:135. doi: 10.3390/cells13020135. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ong S., Choudhury D., Naing M.W. Cell-based meat: Current ambiguities with nomenclature. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020;102:223–231. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.010. - DOI
    1. Bryant C., Barnett J. Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A systematic review. Meat Sci. 2018;143:8–17. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Post M.J., Levenberg S., Kaplan D.L., Genovese N., Fu J., Bryant C.J., Negowetti N., Verzijden K., Moutsatsou P. Scientific, sustainability and regulatory challenges of cultured meat. Nat. Food. 2020;1:403–415. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-0112-z. - DOI
    1. Kadim I.T., Mahgoub O., Baqir S., Faye B., Purchas R. Cultured meat from muscle stem cells: A review of challenges and prospects. J. Integr. Agric. 2015;14:222–233. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60881-9. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources