Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb 20;16(5):851.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16050851.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Extracranial Oligometastatic Disease from Head and Neck Primary Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Extracranial Oligometastatic Disease from Head and Neck Primary Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adam Mutsaers et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Introduction: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat disease in the oligometastatic (OM) setting due to mounting evidence demonstrating its efficacy and safety. Given the low population representation in prospective studies, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of HNC patients with extracranial OM disease treated with SBRT.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted with Cochrane, Medline, and Embase databases queried from inception to August 2022 for studies with extracranial OM HNC treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. Polymetastatic patients (>five lesions), mixed-primary cohorts failing to report HNC separately, lack of treatment to all lesions, nonquantitative endpoints, and other definitive treatments (surgery, conventional radiotherapy, and radioablation) were excluded. The meta-analysis examined the pooled effects of 12- and 24-month local control (LC) per lesion, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Weighted random-effects were assessed using the DerSimonian and Laird method, with heterogeneity evaluated using the I2 statistic and Cochran Qtest. Forest plots were generated for each endpoint.

Results: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria (639 patients, 831 lesions), with twelve eligible for quantitative synthesis with common endpoints and sufficient reporting. Fourteen studies were retrospective, with a single prospective trial. Studies were small, with a median of 32 patients (range: 6-81) and 63 lesions (range: 6-126). The OM definition varied, with a maximum of two to five metastases, mixed synchronous and metachronous lesions, and a few studies including oligoprogressive lesions. The most common site of metastasis was the lung. Radiation was delivered in 1-10 fractions (20-70 Gy). The one-year LC (LC1), reported in 12 studies, was 86.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.3-91.9%). LC2 was 77.9% (95% CI: 66.4-86.3%), with heterogeneity across studies. PFS was reported in five studies, with a PFS1 of 43.0% (95% CI: 35.0-51.4%) and PFS2 of 23.9% (95% CI: 17.8-31.2%), with homogeneity across studies. OS was analyzed in nine studies, demonstrating an OS1 of 80.1% (95% CI: 74.2-85.0%) and OS2 of 60.7% (95% CI: 51.3-69.4%). Treatment was well tolerated with no reported grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Grade 3 toxicity rates were uniformly below 5% when reported.

Conclusions: SBRT offers excellent LC and promising OS, with acceptable toxicities in OM HNC. Durable PFS remains rare, highlighting the need for effective local or systemic therapies in this population. Further investigations on concurrent and adjuvant therapies are warranted.

Keywords: HNSCC; SABR; SBRT; oligometastases; oligoprogression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.V.L. received honoraria and serves on an advisory board for Astra Zeneca, which is unrelated to the present work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) One- and two-year local control forest plots. (B) One- and two-year overall survival forest plots.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) One- and two-year local control forest plots. (B) One- and two-year overall survival forest plots.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lewis S.L., Porceddu S., Nakamura N., Palma D.A., Lo S.S., Hoskin P., Moghanaki D., Chmura S.J., Salama J.K. Definitive Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Extracranial Oligometastases: An International Survey of >1000 Radiation Oncologists. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017;40:418–422. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000169. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olson R., Jiang W., Liu M., Bergman A., Schellenberg D., Mou B., Alexander A., Carolan H., Hsu F., Miller S., et al. Treatment With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Up to 5 Oligometastases in Patients With Cancer: Primary Toxic Effect Results of the Nonrandomized Phase 2 SABR-5 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2022 doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4394. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Qu X.M., Chen Y., Zaric G.S., Senan S., Olson R.A., Harrow S., John-Baptiste A., Gaede S., Mulroy L.A., Schellenberg D., et al. Is SABR Cost-Effective in Oligometastatic Cancer? An Economic Analysis of the SABR-COMET Randomized Trial. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2021;109:1176–1184. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barry A.S., Helou J., Bezjak A., Wong R., Dawson L.A., Ringash J., Fazelzad R., Liu Z., Olson R., Palma D., et al. Health related quality of life outcomes following stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with oligo-metastatic disease: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Radiother. Oncol. J. Eur. Soc. Ther. Radiol. Oncol. 2022;173:163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen H., Louie A.V., Higginson D.S., Palma D.A., Colaco R., Sahgal A. Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Management of Oligometastatic Disease. Clin. Oncol. R. Coll. Radiol. 2020;32:713–727. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.06.018. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources