Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 27;16(5):962.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16050962.

Tracking Cancer: Exploring Heart Rate Variability Patterns by Cancer Location and Progression

Affiliations

Tracking Cancer: Exploring Heart Rate Variability Patterns by Cancer Location and Progression

Kfir Ben-David et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) is an autonomic nervous system (ANS) response that may indicate dysfunction in the human body. Consistent evidence shows cancer patients elicit lower HRV; however, only select cancer locations were previously evaluated. Thus, the aim of the current study was to explore HRV patterns in patients diagnosed with and in varying stages of the most prevalent cancers. At a single tertiary academic medical center, 798 patients were recruited. HRV was measured via an armband monitor (Warfighter MonitorTM, Tiger Tech Solutions, Inc., Miami, FL, USA) equipped with electrocardiographic capabilities and was recorded for 5 to 7 min with patients seated in an upright position. Three time-domain metrics were calculated: SDNN (standard deviation of the NN interval), rMSSD (the root mean square of successive differences of NN intervals), and the percentage of time in which the change in successive NN intervals exceeds 50ms within a measurement (pNN50). Of the 798 patients, 399 were diagnosed with cancer. Cancer diagnoses were obtained via medical records one week following the measurement. Analysis of variance models were performed comparing the HRV patterns between different cancers, cancer stages (I-IV), and demographic strata. A total of 85% of the cancer patients had breast, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, or respiratory cancer. The cancer patients were compared to a control non-cancer patient population with similar patient size and distributions for sex, age, body mass index, and co-morbidities. For all HRV metrics, non-cancer patients exhibited significantly higher rMSSDs (11.1 to 13.9 ms, p < 0.0001), SDNNs (22.8 to 27.7 ms, p < 0.0001), and pNN50s (6.2 to 8.1%, p < 0.0001) compared to stage I or II cancer patients. This significant trend was consistently observed across each cancer location. Similarly, compared to patients with stage III or IV cancer, non-cancer patients possessed lower HRs (-11.8 to -14.0 bpm, p < 0.0001) and higher rMSSDs (+31.7 to +32.8 ms, p < 0.0001), SDNNs (+45.2 to +45.8 ms), p < 0.0001, and pNN50s (19.2 to 21.6%, p < 0.0001). The HR and HRV patterns observed did not significantly differ between cancer locations (p = 0.96 to 1.00). The depressed HRVs observed uniformly across the most prevalent cancer locations and stages appeared to occur independent of patients' co-morbidities. This finding highlights the potentially effective use of HRV as a non-invasive tool for determining common cancer locations and their respective stages. More studies are needed to delineate the HRV patterns across different ages, between sexes and race/ethnic groups.

Keywords: autonomic nervous system; cancer; chronic disease; heart rate variability; oncology; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following authors are paid employees of Tiger Tech Solutions, Inc., the owner of the Warfighter Monitor used in this study: S.H.W., M.J.W., H.L.W., and S.M.M. The authors K.B. and S.L. report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Autonomic nervous system function in cancer and non-cancer cases by cancer location and stage. (A) HR (bpm), (B) rMSSD (ms), (C) SDNN (ms) and (D) pNN50 (%).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Crosby D., Bhatia S., Brindle K.M., Coussens L.M., Dive C., Emberton M., Esener S., Fitzgerald R.C., Gambhir S.S., Kuhn P., et al. Early Detection of Cancer. Science. 2022;375:eaay9040. doi: 10.1126/science.aay9040. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Incidence and Relative Survival by Stage at Diagnosis for Common Cancers. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; Atlanta, GA, USA: 2021.
    1. Hui D. Prognostication of Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Predicting the Unpredictable? Cancer Control J. Moffitt Cancer Cent. 2015;22:489–497. doi: 10.1177/107327481502200415. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barzi A., Lenz H.-J., Quinn D.I., Sadeghi S. Comparative Effectiveness of Screening Strategies for Colorectal Cancer. Cancer. 2017;123:1516–1527. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30518. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loud J.T., Murphy J. Cancer Screening and Early Detection in the 21(St) Century. Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 2017;33:121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2017.02.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources