Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 28;13(5):663.
doi: 10.3390/plants13050663.

Responses of Crop Yield, Soil Fertility, and Heavy Metals to Spent Mushroom Residues Application

Affiliations

Responses of Crop Yield, Soil Fertility, and Heavy Metals to Spent Mushroom Residues Application

Qichao Tang et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Waste mushroom residues are often returned to fields as organic amendments. Here, we estimated the effects of the continuous applications of different spent mushroom substrates for 2 years on crop yields, soil nutrients, and heavy metals in paddy fields. The study comprised seven treatments: no fertilization (CK) and mineral NPK fertilizer (CF), as well as NPK fertilizer combined with Enoki mushroom residue (EMR50), Oyster mushroom residue (OMR50), Auricularia polytricha mushroom residue (APR50), Shiitake mushroom residue (SMR50), and Agaricus bisporus residue (ABR50). The grain yield was highest under the APR50 treatment. The short-term application of waste mushroom residue significantly increased SOC, TN, TP, and TK content relative to the CK treatment. The SOC, TP, and TK were highest under ABR50. Both total Cr and Cd contents were highest under CF treatment. The highest cumulative ecological risk was observed under OMR50 treatment. In addition, crop yield was positively correlated with SOC, TN, TP, and TP. Our results highlight that further research and innovation are needed to optimize the benefits and overcome the challenges of mushroom residue application.

Keywords: agro-ecosystems; crop yield; heavy metal; mushroom residue; soil fertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of different waste mushroom residue application on soil fertility. (a) Effect of different waste mushroom residue application on SOC. (b) Effect of different waste mushroom residue application on SOC. (c) Effect of different waste mushroom residue application on TP. (d) Effect of different waste mushroom residue application on TK. SOC, TN, TP, and TK indicate soil organic carbon content, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and total potassium, respectively. CK, CF, EMR50, OMR50, APR50, SMR50, and ABR50 indicate no fertilization, mineral NPK fertilizers, and NPK fertilizer combined with Enoki mushroom residue, Oyster mushroom residue, Auricularia polytricha mushroom residue, Shiitake mushroom residue, and Agaricus bisporus residue. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of mushroom residue application on heavy metal contents and the cumulative risk. (a) Effect of different waste mushroom residue application on Cr. (b) Effect of different waste mushroom residue application on Cd. (c) Effect of different waste mushroom residue application on Pb. (d) Effect of different waste mushroom residue application on RI index. Cr, Cd, Pb, and RI indicate chromium, cadmium, lead, and potential ecological risk. CK, CF, EMR50, OMR50, APR50 SMR50, and ABR50 indicate no fertilization, mineral NPK fertilizers, and NPK fertilizer combined with Enoki mushroom residue, Oyster mushroom residue, Auricularia polytricha mushroom residue, Shiitake mushroom residue, and Agaricus bisporus residue. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationships between soil nutrients and crop yield and heavy metals. The black circles indicate the observed data. The red line indicates the fitted line. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. The red square represents a strong tendency towards statistical significance (p = 0.051). Yield, TN, TP, TK, SOC, Cr, Cd, and Pb indicate crop yield, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total potassium, soil organic carbon, chromium, cadmium, and lead, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic diagram of field fertilization management.

References

    1. Tan F., Hou Y., Huang X., Jia J., Yang H., Luo P. Temporal and Spatial Arrangement of Wheat Sowing Date: A Revolutionary Strategy to Accomplish Tianfu Granary. Front. Plant Sci. 2023;14:1240417. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1240417. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shao Z., Chen C., Liu Y., Cao J., Liao G., Lin Z. Impact of Land Use Change on Carbon Storage Based on FLUS-InVEST Model: A Case Study of Chengdu–Chongqing Urban Agglomeration, China. Land. 2023;12:1531. doi: 10.3390/land12081531. - DOI
    1. Zhang D., Dong H. Understanding Arable Land Change Patterns and Driving Forces in Major Grain-Producing Areas: A Case Study of Sichuan Province Using the PLUS Model. Land. 2023;12:1443. doi: 10.3390/land12071443. - DOI
    1. Zheng J., Chi Z., Jiang X., Tang Y., Zhang H. Experiences and Research Perspectives on Sustainable Development of Rice-Wheat Cropping Systems in the Chengdu Plain, China. Agric. Sci. China. 2010;9:1317–1325. doi: 10.1016/S1671-2927(09)60249-2. - DOI
    1. Wang Y., Liang B., Bao H., Chen Q., Cao Y., He Y., Li L. Potential of Crop Straw Incorporation for Replacing Chemical Fertilizer and Reducing Nutrient Loss in Sichuan Province, China. Environ. Pollut. 2023;320:121034. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121034. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources