Impact of template denaturation prior to whole genome amplification on gene detection in high GC-content species, Burkholderia mallei and B. pseudomallei
- PMID: 38475810
- PMCID: PMC10935807
- DOI: 10.1186/s13104-024-06717-8
Impact of template denaturation prior to whole genome amplification on gene detection in high GC-content species, Burkholderia mallei and B. pseudomallei
Abstract
Objective: In this study, we sought to determine the types and prevalence of antimicrobial resistance determinants (ARDs) in Burkholderia spp. strains using the Antimicrobial Resistance Determinant Microarray (ARDM).
Results: Whole genome amplicons from 22 B. mallei (BM) and 37 B. pseudomallei (BP) isolates were tested for > 500 ARDs using ARDM v.3.1. ARDM detected the following Burkholderia spp.-derived genes, aac(6), blaBP/MBL-3, blaABPS, penA-BP, and qacE, in both BM and BP while blaBP/MBL-1, macB, blaOXA-42/43 and penA-BC were observed in BP only. The method of denaturing template for whole genome amplification greatly affected the numbers and types of genes detected by the ARDM. BlaTEM was detected in nearly a third of BM and BP amplicons derived from thermally, but not chemically denatured templates. BlaTEM results were confirmed by PCR, with 81% concordance between methods. Sequences from 414-nt PCR amplicons (13 preparations) were 100% identical to the Klebsiella pneumoniae reference gene. Although blaTEM sequences have been observed in B. glumae, B. cepacia, and other undefined Burkholderia strains, this is the first report of such sequences in BM/BP/B. thailandensis (BT) clade. These results highlight the importance of sample preparation in achieving adequate genome coverage in methods requiring untargeted amplification before analysis.
Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance; ESBL; Extended-spectrum β-lactamase; Resistome; Select agents.
© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Conflict of interest statement
Chris R. Taitt is employed by Nova Research Inc. DTRA was active in both the research design and project management, and in preparation of the manuscript. All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Detection and differentiation of Burkholderia pseudomallei, Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia thailandensis by multiplex PCR.FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2005 Mar 1;43(3):413-7. doi: 10.1016/j.femsim.2004.10.008. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2005. PMID: 15708316
-
A Quadruplex Real-Time PCR Assay for the Rapid Detection and Differentiation of the Most Relevant Members of the B. pseudomallei Complex: B. mallei, B. pseudomallei, and B. thailandensis.PLoS One. 2016 Oct 13;11(10):e0164006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164006. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27736903 Free PMC article.
-
A conserved active site PenA β-lactamase Ambler motif specific for Burkholderia pseudomallei/B. mallei is likely responsible for intrinsic amoxicillin-clavulanic acid sensitivity and facilitates a simple diagnostic PCR assay for melioidosis.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Mar;61(3):106714. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106714. Epub 2023 Jan 12. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023. PMID: 36640845
-
PCR-based Methodologies Used to Detect and Differentiate the Burkholderia pseudomallei complex: B. pseudomallei, B. mallei, and B. thailandensis.Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2014;16:23-54. Epub 2013 Aug 22. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2014. PMID: 23969318 Review.
-
Pathogenesis of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei.Mil Med. 2009 Jun;174(6):647-51. Mil Med. 2009. PMID: 19585782 Review.
References
-
- World Health Organization . Global antimicrobial resistance and use surveillance system (GLASS) report 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous