Consensus statement-graft treatment in cardiovascular bypass graft surgery
- PMID: 38476377
- PMCID: PMC10927966
- DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1285685
Consensus statement-graft treatment in cardiovascular bypass graft surgery
Abstract
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is and continues to be the preferred revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel disease. Graft selection has been shown to influence the outcomes following CABG. During the last almost 60 years saphenous vein grafts (SVG) together with the internal mammary artery have become the standard of care for patients undergoing CABG surgery. While there is little doubt about the benefits, the patency rates are constantly under debate. Despite its acknowledged limitations in terms of long-term patency due to intimal hyperplasia, the saphenous vein is still the most often used graft. Although reendothelialization occurs early postoperatively, the process of intimal hyperplasia remains irreversible. This is due in part to the persistence of high shear forces, the chronic localized inflammatory response, and the partial dysfunctionality of the regenerated endothelium. "No-Touch" harvesting techniques, specific storage solutions, pressure controlled graft flushing and external stenting are important and established methods aiming to overcome the process of intimal hyperplasia at different time levels. Still despite the known evidence these methods are not standard everywhere. The use of arterial grafts is another strategy to address the inferior SVG patency rates and to perform CABG with total arterial revascularization. Composite grafting, pharmacological agents as well as latest minimal invasive techniques aim in the same direction. To give guide and set standards all graft related topics for CABG are presented in this expert opinion document on graft treatment.
Keywords: CABG; VEST; endothelium; heart; radial artery.
© 2024 Emmert, Bonatti, Caliskan, Gaudino, Grabenwöger, Grapow, Heinisch, Kieser-Prieur, Kim, Kiss, Mouriquhe, Mach, Margariti, Pepper, Perrault, Podesser, Puskas, Taggart, Yadava and Winkler.
Conflict of interest statement
EC is a member of the registry advisory committee (RAC). LP is a member of the RAC and is a consultant for Marizyme. ME is the principal investigator of the registry, the chair of the RAC and a consultant for Marizyme. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A Randomized Trial of External Stenting for Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;99(6):2039-45. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.01.060. Epub 2015 Apr 15. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015. PMID: 25886810 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Adding Ticagrelor to Standard Aspirin on Saphenous Vein Graft Patency in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (POPular CABG): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Circulation. 2020 Nov 10;142(19):1799-1807. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050749. Epub 2020 Aug 31. Circulation. 2020. Retracted and republished in: Circulation. 2021 Jul 13;144(2):e36. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001004. PMID: 32862716 Retracted and republished. Clinical Trial.
-
Sequential Versus Individual Saphenous Vein Grafting During Coronary Arterial Bypass Surgery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Apr;109(4):1165-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.07.094. Epub 2019 Sep 17. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020. PMID: 31539513
-
Saphenous Vein Graft Failure: From Pathophysiology to Prevention and Treatment Strategies.Circulation. 2021 Aug 31;144(9):728-745. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052163. Epub 2021 Aug 30. Circulation. 2021. PMID: 34460327 Review.
-
Device profile of the VEST for external support of SVG Coronary artery bypass grafting: historical development, current status, and future directions.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Oct;18(10):921-931. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1960504. Epub 2021 Oct 20. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021. PMID: 34311644 Review.
Cited by
-
The Burden of Obesity in Cardiac Surgery: A 14 years' Follow-Up of 14.754 Patients.J Obes. 2024 May 15;2024:5564810. doi: 10.1155/2024/5564810. eCollection 2024. J Obes. 2024. PMID: 38779349 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Vascular Effects of Sirolimus and Everolimus on Isolated Human Saphenous Veins.Life (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;15(4):553. doi: 10.3390/life15040553. Life (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40283108 Free PMC article.
-
GSNO as a Modulator of Vascular Tone in Human Saphenous Veins: Potential Implications for Graft Spasm.Life (Basel). 2025 Jul 19;15(7):1139. doi: 10.3390/life15071139. Life (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40724641 Free PMC article.
-
External Support of Autologous Internal Jugular Vein Grafts with FRAME Mesh in a Porcine Carotid Artery Model.Biomedicines. 2024 Jun 16;12(6):1335. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12061335. Biomedicines. 2024. PMID: 38927542 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Neumann F-J, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al. ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. (2018) 2018(40):87–165. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394 - DOI
-
- Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, Ovitt T, Sethi G, Copeland JG, et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery results from a department of veterans affairs cooperative study. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2004) 44:2149–56. 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.064 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources