Cost-Effectiveness of Inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- PMID: 38476508
- PMCID: PMC10928466
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55999
Cost-Effectiveness of Inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Abstract
Introduction Our department conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare the efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring devices versus capillary blood glucose in the glycemic control of inpatient type 2 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy in a Portuguese hospital. The use of continuous glucose monitoring devices was associated with improved glycemic control, including an increased number of glucose readings within target range and reduced hyperglycemic events, being safe concerning hypoglycemias. This is the cost-effectiveness analysis associated with these results. Aim The primary objective was to compare the cost-effectiveness of achieving glycemic control, defined as the number of patients within glycemic goals, between groups. Secondary endpoints included cost-effectiveness analyses of each time in range goal, and each percentual increment in time in range. Methods We defined each glycemic goal as: "readings within range (70-180 mg/dL) >70%", "readings below range (below 70 mg/dL) <4%", "severe hypoglycemia (below 54 mg/dL) <1%", "readings above range (above 180 mg/dL) <25%", "very high glycemic readings (above 250 mg/dL) <5%". Results Continuous glucose monitoring showed lower median cost per effect for the primary outcome (€11.1 vs. €34.9/patient), with lower cost for readings in range (€7.8 vs. €11.6/patient) and for both readings above range goals ("above 180mg/dL": €7.4 vs. €9.9/patient, and "above 250mg/dL": €6.9 vs. €17.4/patient). Conclusions There are no published data regarding the cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring devices in inpatient settings. Our results show that continuous glucose monitoring devices were associated with an improved glycemic control, at a lower cost, and endorse the feasibility of incorporating these devices into hospital settings, presenting a favorable cost-effective option compared to capillary blood glucose.
Keywords: continuous glucose monitoring; cost-effectiveness; hospitalized patients; portugal; type 2 diabetes.
Copyright © 2024, Veríssimo et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Continuous Glucose Monitoring vs. Capillary Blood Glucose in Hospitalized Type 2 Diabetes Patients.Cureus. 2023 Aug 21;15(8):e43832. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43832. eCollection 2023 Aug. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37736430 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with multiple daily insulin injection for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus evaluated by retrospective continuous glucose monitoring: A real-world data analysis.Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 25;10:990281. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.990281. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36091534 Free PMC article.
-
Flash glucose monitoring reduces glycemic variability and hypoglycemia: real-world data from Spain.BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Mar;8(1):e001052. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001052. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020. PMID: 32198165 Free PMC article.
-
Insulin Therapy in Hospitalized Patients.Am J Ther. 2020 Jan/Feb;27(1):e71-e78. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001078. Am J Ther. 2020. PMID: 31833876 Review.
-
Leveraging advances in diabetes technologies in primary care: a narrative review.Ann Med. 2021 Dec;53(1):805-816. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1931427. Ann Med. 2021. PMID: 34184589 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Diabetes technology: standards of medical care in diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44:0–99. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources