Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023;51(4):757-763.
doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.159. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

Using Racial Justice Principles in Medical-Legal Partnership Design and Implementation

Affiliations

Using Racial Justice Principles in Medical-Legal Partnership Design and Implementation

Alice Setrini. J Law Med Ethics. 2023.

Abstract

Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) have the potential to address racial health disparities by improving the conditions that constitute the social determinants of health. In order to live up to this potential, these partnerships must intentionally incorporate seven core racial justice principles into their design and implementation. Otherwise, they are likely to replicate the systemic barriers that lead to racialized health disparities.

Keywords: Implicit Bias; Mlp Design; Racial Justice; Systems Thinking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Shriver Center on Poverty Law, Racial Justice Institute, available at <https://www.povertylaw.org/events/overview/rji/> (last visited July 1, 2023).
    1. Marmot M., “Social Determinants of Health Inequalities,” The Lancet 365 no. 9464 (2005): 1099–1104. - PubMed
    1. Yearby R. et al., “Structural Racism in Historical and Modern US Health Care Policy,” Health Affairs 4, no. 2 (2022): 187–194, doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01466. See also M. D. Makhlouf, “Towards Racial Justice: The Role of Medical-Legal Partnership,” Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics 50, no. 1 (2022): 117-23.
    1. Houseman A. W., “Racial Justice: The Role of Civil Legal Assistance,” Clearinghouse Review 36, no. 5 (2002): 5–14.
    1. Shriver Center, supra note 1.