Comparison of metabolic parameters between pure-uric acid and mixed-uric acid kidney stone formers
- PMID: 38478092
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04829-1
Comparison of metabolic parameters between pure-uric acid and mixed-uric acid kidney stone formers
Abstract
Purpose: We seek to compare clinical and 24-h urine parameters between pure-uric acid (UA) and UA-CaOx stone formers in our practice and explore how any differences in metabolic profiles could suggest different prevention strategies between the two groups.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with either pure- or mixed-UA nephrolithiasis from 2020 to 2023 at a tertiary care center. We included patients with a 24-h urine collection and a stone analysis detecting any amount of UA. Patients were organized into two cohorts: (1) those with 100% UA stones and (2) < 100% UA stones. Differences in demographic characteristics were compared between pure-UA and UA-CaOx stone formers. Twenty-four hour urine metabolic parameters as well as metabolic abnormalities were compared between the pure-uric acid and mixed-uric acid groups.
Results: We identified 33 pure-UA patients and 33 mixed-UA patients. Patient demographics were similar between the groups (Table 1). Pure- and mixed-UA patients had a similar incidence of metabolic syndrome, diabetes, history of stones, and stone burden. Table 1 Demographic and baseline characteristics among pure- and mixed-uric acid stone formers Pure-uric acid stones (n = 33) Mixed-uric acid stones (n = 33) p-value Median age [IQR] 63.00 [58.00-72.50] 63.00 [53.50-68.00] 0.339 Median BMI [IQR] 28.79 [25.81-33.07] 27.96 [25.81-29.55] 0.534 Gender, n (%) 1.000 Male 21 (63.6) 21 (63.6) Female 12 (36.4) 12 (36.4) Metabolic syndrome, n (%) 17 (51.5) 16 (48.5) 0.806 Diabetes, n (%) 13 (39.4) 12 (36.4) 0.800 History of stones, n (%) 23 (69.7) 22 (66.7) 0.792 Median total stone burden, mm [IQR] 12.00 [6.00-26.50] 13.00 [7.05-20.00] 0.995 Median serum uric acid, mg/dL [IQR] 6.20 [4.80-7.15] 5.90 [4.98-6.89] 0.582 IQR Interquartile range BMI Body Mass Index n number We found the pure-UA cohort to have 24-h lower urine volume (1.53 vs. 1.96 L/day, p = 0.045) and citrate levels (286 vs. 457 mg/day, p = 0.036). UA-CaOx stone formers had higher urinary calcium levels (144 vs. 68 mg/day, p = 0.003), higher urinary oxalate levels (38 vs. 30 mg/day, p = 0.017), and higher median urinary calcium oxalate super-saturation (3.97 vs. 3.06, p = 0.047).
Conclusions: Pure-UA kidney stone formers have different urinary metabolic parameters when compared with UA-CaOx stone formers, thus requiring different and tailored medical management.
Keywords: Calcium oxalate; Kidney stones; Uric acid; Urinary metabolism.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the metabolic profile of mixed calcium oxalate/uric acid stone formers to that of pure calcium oxalate and pure uric acid stone formers.Urology. 2014 Aug;84(2):289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 Jun 12. Urology. 2014. PMID: 24929942
-
Clinical and biochemical profile of patients with "pure" uric acid nephrolithiasis compared with "pure" calcium oxalate stone formers.Urol Res. 2007 Oct;35(5):247-51. doi: 10.1007/s00240-007-0109-1. Epub 2007 Sep 6. Urol Res. 2007. PMID: 17786420
-
Biochemical and dietary factors of uric acid stone formation.Urolithiasis. 2018 Apr;46(2):167-172. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0965-2. Epub 2017 Feb 28. Urolithiasis. 2018. PMID: 28246885
-
Dietary treatment of urinary risk factors for renal stone formation. A review of CLU Working Group.Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2015 Jul 7;87(2):105-20. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2015.2.105. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2015. PMID: 26150027 Review.
-
Nephrolithiasis.2020 Mar 9. In: Feingold KR, Ahmed SF, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Kapoor N, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Muzumdar R, Purnell J, Rey R, Sahay R, Shah AS, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. 2020 Mar 9. In: Feingold KR, Ahmed SF, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Kapoor N, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Muzumdar R, Purnell J, Rey R, Sahay R, Shah AS, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 25905296 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Stone Composition on Treatment Strategies for Patients with Urolithiasis: A Narrative Review.Cureus. 2024 Dec 8;16(12):e75345. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75345. eCollection 2024 Dec. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39781155 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical