Nadir prostate-specific antigen after salvage cryotherapy as a potential prognostic factor for oncologic outcomes
- PMID: 38478102
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04806-8
Nadir prostate-specific antigen after salvage cryotherapy as a potential prognostic factor for oncologic outcomes
Abstract
Purpose: To report oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing salvage cryotherapy (SCT) for local recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) and to establish a nadir PSA (nPSA) value that best defines long-term oncologic success.
Methods: Retrospective study of men who underwent SCT for local recurrence of PCa between 2008 and 2020. SCT was performed in men with biochemical recurrence (BCR), after primary treatment and with biopsy-proven PCa local recurrence. Survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier and Cox models was performed. We determined the optimal cutoff nPSA value after SCT that best classifies patients depending on prognosis.
Results: Seventy-seven men who underwent SCT were included. Survival analysis showed a 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), androgen deprivation therapy-free survival (AFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) after SCT of 48.4%, 62% and 81.3% respectively. On multivariable analysis for perioperative variables associated with BCR, initial ISUP, pre-SCT PSA, pre-SCT prostate volume and post-SCT nPSA emerged as variables associated with BCR. The cutoff analysis revealed an nPSA < 0.5 ng/ml to be the optimal threshold that best defines success after SCT. 5-year BRFS for patients achieving an nPSA < 0.5 vs nPSA ≥ 0.5 was 64% and 9.5% respectively (p < 0.001). 5-year AFS for men with nPSA < 0.5 vs ≥ 0.5 was 81.2% and 12.2% (p < 0.001). Improved 5-year MFS for patients who achieved nPSA < 0.5 was also obtained (89.6% vs 60%, p = 0.003).
Conclusion: SCT is a feasible rescue alternative for the local recurrence of PCa. Achieving an nPSA < 0.5 ng/ml after SCT is associated with higher long-term BRFS, AFS and MFS rates.
Keywords: Local recurrence; Nadir PSA; Prostate cancer; Salvage cryotherapy; Salvage treatment.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Predictors of biochemical failure in patients undergoing prostate whole-gland salvage cryotherapy: a novel risk stratification model.BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(4):E256-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11695.x. Epub 2013 Mar 7. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 23469778
-
Intermediate-term oncological and functional outcomes of salvage cryotherapy for the management of prostate cancer recurrence after primary brachytherapy versus primary cryotherapy: A propensity score-matched analysis.Prostate. 2023 Oct;83(14):1373-1386. doi: 10.1002/pros.24600. Epub 2023 Jul 19. Prostate. 2023. PMID: 37469120
-
Disease-free survival following salvage cryotherapy for biopsy-proven radio-recurrent prostate cancer.Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):405-10. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.012. Epub 2010 Dec 21. Eur Urol. 2011. PMID: 21185115
-
Local tumor control with salvage cryotherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy.J Urol. 2001 Mar;165(3):867-70. J Urol. 2001. PMID: 11176488 Review.
-
Management of Biochemical Recurrence after Primary Curative Treatment for Prostate Cancer: A Review.Urol Int. 2018;100(3):251-262. doi: 10.1159/000481438. Epub 2017 Nov 21. Urol Int. 2018. PMID: 29161715 Review.
Cited by
-
Oncological effects and complications of salvage cryotherapy for radio-recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 3;15:1534739. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1534739. eCollection 2025. Front Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40248202 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Scherzer ND, DiBiase ZS, Srivastav SK et al (2019) Regional differences in the treatment of localized prostate cancer: an analysis of surgery and radiation utilization in the United States. Adv Radiat Oncol 4:331–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.01.004 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Mahal BA, Butler S, Franco I et al (2019) Use of active surveillance or watchful waiting for low-risk prostate cancer and management trends across risk groups in the United States, 2010–2015. J Urol 202:451–452. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.19941 - DOI
-
- Agarwal PK, Sadetsky N, Konety BR et al (2008) Treatment failure after primary and salvage therapy for prostate cancer: likelihood, patterns of care, and outcomes. Cancer 112:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23161 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zumsteg ZS, Spratt DE, Romesser PB et al (2015) Anatomic patterns of recurrence following biochemical relapse in the dose-escalation era for prostate patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy. J Urol 194:1624–1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.100.Anatomic - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Cohen JK, Miller RJ, Ahmed S et al (2008) Ten-year biochemical disease control for patients with prostate cancer treated with cryosurgery as primary therapy. Urology 71:515–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.059 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous