Perinatal outcomes according to umbilical artery Doppler assessment among fetuses with congenital heart disease
- PMID: 38478160
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07401-9
Perinatal outcomes according to umbilical artery Doppler assessment among fetuses with congenital heart disease
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate a cohort of fetuses with congenital heart disease (CHD) who underwent serial umbilical artery (UA) Doppler surveillance and assess perinatal outcome according to UA Doppler assessment.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of singleton fetuses with CHD at a single academic center was performed between 2018 and 2020. Fetuses with a chromosomal abnormality or growth restriction were excluded. We compared fetuses with normal versus abnormal UA Doppler assessment at any time in pregnancy. Abnormal UA Doppler assessment was defined as decreased end diastolic flow, determined by an elevated systolic/diastolic ratio >95th percentile for gestational age, or absent/reversed end diastolic flow. Logistic regression assessed the odds of fetuses with CHD and abnormal UA Doppler assessment having a composite adverse perinatal (defined as fetal, neonatal, or infant death), adjusting for relevant covariates.
Results: We identified a cohort of 171 fetuses with CHD that met inclusion criteria. Of these, 154 (90%) had normal UA Doppler assessment and 17 (10%) had abnormal UA Doppler assessment throughout pregnancy. Maternal characteristics did not differ between groups except for maternal race and history of preeclampsia. There was no statistically significant difference in primary outcome between groups [14% (21/154) of fetuses with normal UA Doppler assessment had an adverse perinatal outcome compared to 24% (4/17) of those with abnormal UA Doppler assessment, p = 0.28].
Conclusion: UA Doppler assessment is unlikely to predict adverse perinatal outcome in normally grown, euploid singleton fetuses with CHD.
Keywords: Adverse outcome; Prenatal; Retrospective cohort; Umbilical artery Doppler.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
The association between discordant umbilical arterial resistance in growth-restricted fetuses and adverse outcomes.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jul;231(1):130.e1-130.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.025. Epub 2024 Mar 23. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38527602
-
Perinatal outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by selective intrauterine growth restriction according to umbilical artery Doppler flow pattern: single-center study using strict fetal surveillance protocol.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;57(5):748-755. doi: 10.1002/uog.22128. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 32573847
-
Impact of fetal trisomy 21 on umbilical artery Doppler indices.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):8364-8371. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1974388. Epub 2021 Sep 27. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022. PMID: 34570672 Free PMC article.
-
Doppler application in the delivery timing of the preterm growth-restricted fetus: another step in the right direction.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;23(2):111-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.989. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 14770388 Review.
-
Clinical impact of Doppler reference charts on management of small-for-gestational-age fetuses: need for standardization.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;56(2):166-172. doi: 10.1002/uog.20380. Epub 2020 Jun 30. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31237023
Cited by
-
Fetal heart diseases and neonatal mortality: Risk factors and management.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Nov;310(5):2497-2505. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07759-w. Epub 2024 Sep 30. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 39347948
References
-
- Lopez KN, Morris SA, Sexson Tejtel SK, Espaillat A, Salemi JL (2020) US mortality attributable to congenital heart disease across the lifespan from 1999 through 2017 exposes persistent racial/ethnic disparities. Circulation 142(12):1132–1147. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046822 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Hoffman JI, Kaplan S (2002) The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 39(12):1890–1900. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01886-7 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Meise C, Germer U, Gembruch U (2001) Arterial Doppler ultrasound in 115 second- and third-trimester fetuses with congenital heart disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17(5):398–402. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00397.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Al-Gazali W, Chapman MG, Chita SK, Crawford DC, Allan LD (1987) Doppler assessment of umbilical artery blood flow for the prediction of outcome in fetal cardiac abnormality. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94(8):742–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb03719.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Copel JA, Hobbins JC, Kleinman CS (1991) Can umbilical artery pulsatility index predict the outcome of fetuses with structural heart disease? J Ultrasound Med 10(6):323–326. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1991.10.6.323 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous