Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 9;96(14):5407-5415.
doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c05144. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

Overlaid Lateral Flow Immunoassay for the Simultaneous Detection of Two Variant-Specific SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies

Affiliations

Overlaid Lateral Flow Immunoassay for the Simultaneous Detection of Two Variant-Specific SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies

Wanwisa Deenin et al. Anal Chem. .

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccines have been provided to the general public to build immunity since the 2019 coronavirus pandemic. Once vaccinated, SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies (NAbs-COVID-19) are needed for excellent protection against COVID-19. However, monitoring NAbs-COVID-19 is complicated and requires hospital visits. Moreover, the resulting NAbs-COVID-19 are effective against different strains of COVID-19 depending on the type of vaccine received. Here, an overlaid lateral flow immunoassay (O-LFIA) was developed for the simultaneous detection of two NAbs-COVID-19 against different virus strains, Delta and Omicron. The O-LFIA was visualized with two T-lines with a single device using competition between the free antigen and the antigen-binding antibody. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) immobilized on the T-line binds to the antigen remaining after antibody binding. Under the optimum conditions, the proposed device exhibited 50% inhibition concentrations (IC50 values) of 45.1 and 53.6 ng/mL for the Delta and Omicron variants, respectively. Additionally, the proposed platform was applied to real-world samples of animal and human serum, and the developed immunoassay provided results that were in good agreement with those obtained with the standard method. In conclusion, this developed O-LFIA can be used as an alternative method to detect NAbs-COVID-19 and can be enabled for future advancements toward commercialization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of the O-LFIA in each layer and photographs of the O-LFIAs with plastic cassettes for detecting the Delta and the Omicron NAbs-COVID-19 (A) and the immobilized biomaterial on the O-LFIA (B). LFIA positive (C) and negative (D) results when detecting Delta and Omicron NAbs-COVID-19.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow behavior of the O-LFIA using food coloring at different times (A). UV–Vis spectra of AuNPs and RBD/AuNPs (inset; TEM image of AuNPs) (B). Response after simultaneous detection of two variants of NAbs-COVID-19 using the O-LFIA at concentrations of 0–200 ng/mL (C). Color intensity comparison at concentrations of 0 (left), 50 (middle), and 200 (right) ng/mL for the detection of two variants of NAbs-COVID-19 (D) (n = 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Photographs of the O-LFIA responses with different dilutions of Delta and Omicron NAbs-COVID-19 (A). The relationship between % inhibition and different dilutions of ΔNAbs (B) and oNAbs (C). The linear relationship between % inhibition and ΔNAb (inset B) and oNAb (inset C) is also shown (n = 3).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Evaluation of vaccine effectiveness in monkey serum at days 0 (D0), 30 (D30), and 60 (D60) using the O-LFIA and microneutralization assay (MN50 titer).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Schematic diagram of the NAb-COVID-19 O-LFIA procedure (A), vaccine effectiveness determined with human serum using an ELISA test kit (B) and the O-LFIA (C), and correlation analysis for estimating the % inhibition of NAbs-COVID-19 at different NAb-COVID-19 levels using an ELISA test kit and the O-LFIA device (D).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guan W.-j.; Ni Z.-y.; Hu Y.; Liang W.-h.; Ou C.-q.; He J.-x.; Liu L.; Shan H.; Lei C.-l.; Hui D. S. C.; et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382 (18), 1708–1720. 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu Z.; McGoogan J. M. Characteristics of and Important Lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72314 Cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020, 323 (13), 1239–1242. 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yilmazkuday H. Coronavirus disease 2019 and the global economy. Transp. Policy 2022, 120, 40–46. 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.03.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moazeni M.; Rahimi M.; Ebrahimi A. What are the effects of climate variables on COVID-19 pandemic? A systematic review and current update. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2023, 12 (1), 33.10.4103/abr.abr_145_21. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sarkar R.; Mitra S.; Chandra P.; Saha P.; Banerjee A.; Dutta S.; Chawla-Sarkar M. Comprehensive analysis of genomic diversity of SARS-CoV-2 in different geographic regions of India: an endeavour to classify Indian SARS-CoV-2 strains on the basis of co-existing mutations. Arch. Virol. 2021, 166 (3), 801–812. 10.1007/s00705-020-04911-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts