Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Mar 1;65(3):ezae097.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae097.

Chest tube removal at different gas flows in prolonged air leak: a randomized non-inferiority trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Chest tube removal at different gas flows in prolonged air leak: a randomized non-inferiority trial

Xinyang Li et al. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of removing drainage tubes at larger size of air leak in patients with prolonged air leak after pulmonary surgery.

Methods: Ninety-five patients who underwent pulmonary surgery with prolonged air leak in our centre were enrolled in this randomized controlled, single-centre, non-inferiority study. The drainage tube was clamped with a stable size of air leak observed over the last 6 h, which was quantified by gas flow rate using the digital drainage system. The control group (n = 48) and the study group (n = 46) had their drainage tube clamped at 0-20 ml/min and 60-80 ml/min, respectively. We continuously monitored clinical symptoms, conducted imaging and laboratory examinations, and decided whether to reopen the drainage tube.

Results: The reopening rate in the study group was not lower than that in the control group (2.08% vs 6.52%, P > 0.05). The absolute difference in reopening rate was 4.44% (95% confidence interval -0.038 to 0.126), with an upper limit of 12.6% below the non-inferiority margin (15%). There were significant differences in the length of stay [16.5 (13-24.75) vs 13.5 (12-19.25), P = 0.017] and the duration of drainage [12 (9.25-18.50) vs 10 (8-12.25), P = 0.007] between the control and study groups. No notable differences were observed in chest X-ray results 14 days after discharge or in the readmission rate.

Conclusions: For patients with prolonged air leak, removing drainage tubes at larger size of air leak demonstrated similar safety compared to smaller size of air leak, and can shorten both length of stay and drainage duration.

Clinical trial registration number: Name of registry: Gas flow threshold for safe removal of chest drainage in patients with alveolar-pleural fistula prolonged air leak after pulmonary surgery. Registration number: ChiCTR2200067120. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/.

Keywords: Chest drainage tube removal; Digital drainage system; Intrapleural pressure; Prolonged air leak; Pulmonary surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow chart illustrating participants enrolment.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Intrapleural negative pressure and gas flow rate of participants over the last 6 h before clamping the drainage tube. X-axis represent date and time. Grey curves represent intrapleural pressure, and blue curves represent gas flow of air leakage. (a) A representative graph from a patient in the control group. (b) A representative graph from a patient in the study group.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Overall trend of intrapleural negative pressure and gas flow rate of participants before clamping the drainage tube. X-axes represent date and time. Grey curve represents intrapleural pressure, and blue curve represents size of air leak, which is quantified by gas flow rate.
None

Comment in

References

    1. Mueller MR, Marzluf BA.. The anticipation and management of air leaks and residual spaces post lung resection. J Thorac Dis 2014;6:271–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark JM, Cooke DT, Brown LM.. Management of complications after lung resection: prolonged air leak and bronchopleural fistula. Thorac Surg Clin 2020;30:347–58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singhal S, Ferraris VA, Bridges CR, Clough ER, Mitchell JD, Fernando HC. et al. Management of alveolar air leaks after pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:1327–35. - PubMed
    1. Suzuki K, Saji H, Aokage K, Watanabe S-I, Okada M, Mizusawa J. et al.; Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Comparison of pulmonary segmentectomy and lobectomy: safety results of a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019;158:895–907. - PubMed
    1. Dugan KC, Laxmanan B, Murgu S, Hogarth DK.. Management of persistent air leaks. Chest 2017;152:417–23. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types