Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 14;14(1):6146.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55476-w.

Impact of LKB1 status on radiation outcome in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

Affiliations

Impact of LKB1 status on radiation outcome in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

Piyada Sitthideatphaiboon et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Preclinical studies suggest that loss of LKB1 expression renders cancer cells less responsive to radiation partly through NRF2-mediated upregulation of antioxidant enzymes protecting against radiation-induced DNA damage. Here we investigated the association of an alteration in this pathway with radio-resistance in lung cancer patients. Patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) who were treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and analyzed for LKB1 expression using semiquantitative immunohistochemistry. Clinical characteristics and expression of LKB1 were analyzed for association with radiotherapy outcomes. We analyzed 74 available tumor specimens from 178 patients. After a median follow-up of 40.7 months, 2-year cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients who had LKB1Low expression was significantly higher than those with LKB1High expression (68.8% vs. 31.3%, P = 0.0001). LKB1Low expression was found significantly associated with a higher incidence of distant metastases (DM) (P = 0.0008), shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.006), and worse overall survival (OS) (P = 0.02) compared to LKB1High expression. Moreover, patients with LKB1Low expression showed a significantly higher 2-year cumulative incidence of LRR (77.6% vs. 21%; P = 0.02), higher DM recurrence (P = 0.002), and shorter OS (P < 0.0001) compared with the EGFR-mutant group. For all patients with LKB1Low who had LRR, these recurrences occurred within the field of radiation, in contrast to those with LKB1High expression having both in-field, marginal, and out-of-field failures. LKB1 expression may serve as a potential biomarker for poor outcomes after receiving radiation in LA-NSCLC patients. Further studies to confirm the association and application are warranted.

Keywords: Liver kinase B1; Locoregional recurrence; Non-small cell lung cancer; Nuclear factor erythroid 2-like 2; Radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
LKB1 expression status correlates with radiation outcome. (A) Cumulative incidence locoregional recurrence (LRR). Patients with low LKB1 expression had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of LRR than high LKB1 expression (P = 0.0001). (B) Cumulative incidence of distant metastatic (DM) recurrence. LKB1Low patients was also associated with higher DM recurrence than in LKB1High patients (P = 0.0008). (C) Disease-free survival (DFS). DFS was significantly worse in LKB1Low patients than in LKB1High patients (P = 0.006) and (D) Overall survival (OS). OS was significantly worse in LKB1Low patients than in LKB1High patients (P = 0.02).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative incidence of LRR and DM recurrence according to LKB1 expression status and histologic subtype. (A) In non-squamous cell carcinoma subtype, LKB1Low patients had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of LRR than in LKB1High patients (P = 0.0001); however (B), there were not detected among squamous cell carcinoma subtype. (C) The cumulative incidence of DM recurrence in non-squamous cell carcinoma subtype, LKB1Low patients had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of LRR than in LKB1High patients (P < 0.0001); however (D), there were not detected among squamous cell carcinoma subtype.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pattern of locoregional disease according to LKB1 expression status. All LKB1Low patients had in-field failures with 10 type A and 2 type B failures. LKB1High patients, distribution of failure type included 7 in-field (six type A and one for both type A and B), 4 marginal and 2 out-of-field (P = 0.03).

References

    1. Bradley JD, Paulus R, Komaki R, Masters G, Blumenschein G, Schild S, et al. Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): A randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(2):187–199. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71207-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bezjak A, Temin S, Franklin G, Giaccone G, Govindan R, Johnson ML, et al. Definitive and adjuvant radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement of the American society for radiation oncology evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2015;33(18):2100–2105. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.2360. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Machtay M, Paulus R, Moughan J, Komaki R, Bradley JE, Choy H, et al. Defining local-regional control and its importance in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. J. Thorac. Oncol. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Study Lung Cancer. 2012;7(4):716–722. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182429682. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sachs RK, Chen PL, Hahnfeldt PJ, Hlatky LR. DNA damage caused by ionizing radiation. Math. Biosci. 1992;112(2):271–303. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(92)90028-u. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azzam EI, Jay-Gerin JP, Pain D. Ionizing radiation-induced metabolic oxidative stress and prolonged cell injury. Cancer Lett. 2012;327(1–2):48–60. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms