Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;628(8007):408-415.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07172-y. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

Rapid unleashing of macrophage efferocytic capacity via transcriptional pause release

Affiliations

Rapid unleashing of macrophage efferocytic capacity via transcriptional pause release

Turan Tufan et al. Nature. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

During development, inflammation or tissue injury, macrophages may successively engulf and process multiple apoptotic corpses via efferocytosis to achieve tissue homeostasis1. How macrophages may rapidly adapt their transcription to achieve continuous corpse uptake is incompletely understood. Transcriptional pause/release is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism, in which RNA polymerase (Pol) II initiates transcription for 20-60 nucleotides, is paused for minutes to hours and is then released to make full-length mRNA2. Here we show that macrophages, within minutes of corpse encounter, use transcriptional pause/release to unleash a rapid transcriptional response. For human and mouse macrophages, the Pol II pause/release was required for continuous efferocytosis in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, blocking Pol II pause/release did not impede Fc receptor-mediated phagocytosis, yeast uptake or bacterial phagocytosis. Integration of data from three genomic approaches-precision nuclear run-on sequencing, RNA sequencing, and assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing (ATAC-seq)-on efferocytic macrophages at different time points revealed that Pol II pause/release controls expression of select transcription factors and downstream target genes. Mechanistic studies on transcription factor EGR3, prominently regulated by pause/release, uncovered EGR3-related reprogramming of other macrophage genes involved in cytoskeleton and corpse processing. Using lysosomal probes and a new genetic fluorescent reporter, we identify a role for pause/release in phagosome acidification during efferocytosis. Furthermore, microglia from egr3-deficient zebrafish embryos displayed reduced phagocytosis of apoptotic neurons and fewer maturing phagosomes, supporting defective corpse processing. Collectively, these data indicate that macrophages use Pol II pause/release as a mechanism to rapidly alter their transcriptional programs for efficient processing of the ingested apoptotic corpses and for successive efferocytosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Extended Data Fig. 1 |
Extended Data Fig. 1 |. Upregulated genes exhibit reduced pausing indices and pathway divergence during efferocytosis.
a, Gene Ontology pathway analysis (MSigDB) of upregulated and downregulated genes (determined by DESeq2, using the Wald test, padj<0.001) from the PRO-seq data at 45 min of efferocytosis (versus resting macrophages). b, Metagene plot of PRO-seq reads for the 331 genes upregulated in macrophages after 45 min efferocytosis (per Wald test) c, Heat map of PRO-seq signals around the proximal promoter region and gene body of the 331 genes upregulated in macrophages after 45 min efferocytosis. d, e, Cumulative distribution of pausing indices (from four independent experiments) of 331 upregulated genes (n-331) (d) and 105 randomly selected unchanged genes (e) as determined by DESeq2 and the Wald test (left). Pausing indices for each gene are compared between resting macrophages and macrophages after 45 min (top) or 90 min (bottom) of efferocytosis. Paired tow-tailed t-tests. ****p < 0.0001, ns: not significant. f, Upregulated genes (331) were divided into highly paused (PI > 4) and lowly paused genes (PI < 4), and pathway analysis performed via GSEA-MSigDB data base (https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb). In all figures, data are from four independent experimental replicates.
Extended Data Fig. 2 |
Extended Data Fig. 2 |. Pause/release effects on efferocytosis versus Fc receptor-mediated phagocytosis.
a, Immunoblotting showing CDK9, Ser2P and β-Actin protein levels in macrophages treated with either DMSO or flavopiridol (10 μM) for 30 min. n = 3 independent experiments. b, Macrophages treated with DMSO or CDK9 inhibitors were incubated with TAMRA (pH-insensitive)-stained apoptotic Jurkat cells for 30 min. c, CDK9, Ser2P and β-Actin levels in macrophages treated with PROTAC-CDK9 (20 μM) for indicated times (left) or NVP-2 (concentrations indicated) for 30 min (right). n = 1 experiment. d, Efferocytosis quantified in macrophages with concurrent CDK9 inhibitors and apoptotic cells addition. n = 4 (left) and n = 3 (right) independent experiments. Paired two-tailed t-test. e, Uptake of anti-CD90.2-opsonized thymocytes by macrophages treated with NVP-2 (10 μM) or THAL-SNS-032 (20 μM) for 30 min. f, Editing efficiency in CRISPR/Cas9-generated NELFB- and NELFCD-deficient macrophages. n = 1 experiment. g, Efferocytosis kinetics were measured by live cell imaging (Incucyte) using WT and NELF-deficient macrophages incubated with CypHer5E-stained apoptotic Jurkat cells. Cytochalasin D was used as a control. Data are mean ± SEM. n = 4 independent experiments. Area under curve analysis and then unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction. h, i, Continuous efferocytosis by human macrophages (left, n = 4 and right, n = 3 human donors of PBMCs; paired two-tailed t-test) (h) and mouse macrophages (i) treated with DMSO or CDK9 inhibitors. j, Second corpse uptake by mouse macrophages treated with CDK9 inhibitors and fed CypHer5E- and TAMRA-stained apoptotic Jurkat cells at a ratio of 1:1:1 apoptotic cell to phagocyte for 30 min. Double-positive macrophages have engulfed at least two corpses. n = 7 (left) and n = 6 (right) independent experiments. Paired two-tailed t-test. k, l, Continuous uptake of opsonized thymocytes in macrophages treated with DMSO or PROTAC-CDK9. d, g, h, j, Some of control samples were concurrently used in parallel experiments. b, e, i, l, In box and whiskers graphs (the center line denotes median, box edges encompass 25th to 75th percentiles, min to max points), dots show values from four independent experiments, unpaired two-tailed t-test. In all figures, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.001, ns: not significant. Schematics in b,f,ik created with BioRender.com.
Extended Data Fig. 3 |
Extended Data Fig. 3 |. Acidification and specific gene expression patterns during efferocytosis.
a, Continuous efferocytosis of CSFE+ (first round) and TAMRA+ (second round) apoptotic cells by macrophages pre-treated for 30 min with DMSO or bafilomycin A1. n = 4 independent experiments, paired two-tailed t-test. b, Relative expression (as determined by qPCR) of the indicated genes over time in macrophages during phagocytosis of synthetic beads. Data are mean ± SEM. c, PtdSer exposure was induced in RBCs using a calcium ionophore (A23187) and quantified by annexin V staining (left). The uptake of CypHer5E-stained PtdSer+ RBCs by mouse macrophages was assessed by flow cytometry (right) n = 4 independent experiments. Unpaired two-tailed t-test. d, Relative expression of EGR3 (as determined by qPCR) in human macrophages treated with DMSO or flavopiridol during efferocytosis. n:5 human donors of PBMCs; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. a, c, d, In box and whiskers graphs, the center line denotes median, box edges encompass 25th to 75th percentiles, min to max points, and dots show independent data points. In all figures, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001, ns: not significant. Schematics in a,c,d created with BioRender.com.
Extended Data Fig. 4 |
Extended Data Fig. 4 |. EGR3 upregulation via Pol II pause/release during efferocytosis.
a, Heat map (derived from RNA-seq analysis) depicting differentially upregulated transcription factors (Wald test and corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini and Hochberg method) at 45 min efferocytosis. Genes were ranked by fold-change. Data are from four independent experimental replicates. b, PRO-seq tracks (left) and relative pausing index (right) for Egr3 in resting macrophages and during efferocytosis. n = 4 independent experimental replicates. c, Schematic depicting ATAC-seq experiment in which mouse macrophages were fed apoptotic human Jurkat cells for 15 min, 30 min or 45 min of efferocytosis. n = 4 independent experimental replicates. d, Tracks of ATAC-seq showing chromatin accessibility in the promoter region of Egr3 in the resting state and during efferocytosis. Data derived from four independent experimental replicates. e, Relative expression of Egr3 in macrophages (as determined by qPCR) following Egr3 knockdown via shRNA (left) and Egr3 overexpression via retroviral vector (right). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 independent experiments. f, Uptake of CypHer5E-stained apoptotic cells by wild type and Egr3-OE macrophages treated with either DMSO or flavopiridol. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05 g, Fc receptor-mediated phagocytosis of CSFE-stained opsonized thymocytes by wild type, Egr3-deficient and Egr3-OE macrophages was assessed by flow cytometry after 30 min. Thymocytes opsonized with IgG was used as a control. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. ns: non-significant. (f, g) Box and whiskers graphs (the center line denotes median, box edges encompass 25th to 75th percentiles, min to max points), and dots show values from four independent experiments. Schematics in c created with BioRender.com.
Extended Data Fig. 5 |
Extended Data Fig. 5 |. egr3-deficient microglia in Zebrafish development exhibits impaired efferocytic capacity.
a, Schematic depicting the genome editing approach in zebrafish embryos (see method section for details). b, Percentage of injected embryos with confirmed deletion in exon 2 of egr3 across six independent experiments. CRISPANTs embryos (296 bp deletion) = 84.49%. Data are presented as mean ± s.d. N = 6 and 109 embryos analyzed. c, Immunoblotting (left) and quantification (right) of egr3 protein in control versus egr3 CRISPANTs embryos. n = 1 experiment. d, Representative dorsal images of non-injected irf8st95/st95 zebrafish embryo brain after Acridine Orange (AO) staining for apoptotic cells (top) and its segmentation (bottom). Quantification (right) of the basal levels of apoptosis in the optic tecta (OT) of non-injected irf8st95/st95 controls (N = 26) and egr3 CRISPANT (N = 23) embryos using Imaris automatic spot detection. Box and whiskers graphs (the center line denotes median, box edges encompass 25th to 75th percentiles, min to max points), unpaired two-tailed t-test. e, Representative images of a WT microglia at 3 days post fertilization (dpf) having the cytoplasm labelled in green (TgBAC(csf1ra:GAL4-VP16); Tg(UAS:nfsb-mCherry)) and freshly formed phagosomes labeled in magenta (Tg(UAS:mNeonGreen-Rab5)). The upper panel timepoint 1 (T1), in which the phagosome (arrowhead) is visible from the cell body (mCherry-green) but not yet in the Rab5 channel (mNeonGreen-magenta). T2 (4.5 min later) shows Rab5 recruitment to freshly formed phagosomes (arrowhead), indicating successful phagocytosis. Scale bar 10 μm. f, Quantification of phagocytic events (Rab5+ vesicles formed) in each microglia per hour counted. Violin plot, unpaired two-tailed t-test. g, Percentage of microglia having one or no successful phagocytic event (Rab5+ vesicles) per hour over the total. WT controls= 19.3%; egr3 CRISPANTs= 56.4%. e-g, T2 in WT control (N = 7 and n = 88) and egr3 CRISPANT (N = 7 and n = 101) where N=number of embryos and n=number of microglia cells quantified. h, Heat map of differential expression of EGR3-regulated genes that are associated with endosomal pathways. The Wald test corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini and Hochberg method. padj<0.05. i, j, Knockdown efficiency of siRNAs targeting Dmxl2 and Elmo1. Unpaired two-tailed t-test. Three independent experiments, data are presented as mean ± SEM. k, Defective acidification in Dmxl2-deficient macrophages as shown by lysotracker staining during efferocytosis. n:3 independent experiments, paired two-tailed t-test. In all figures, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001, ns: non-significant. Schematics in a created with BioRender.com.
Extended Data Fig. 6 |
Extended Data Fig. 6 |. The pre-corpse internalization stages of efferocytosis impact Pol II release.
a, b, Defective acidification in Egr3-deficient macrophages as shown by lysotracker staining during efferocytosis (a) and GFP quenching in macrophages engulfing CharOFF cells (b). a, Box and whiskers graphs (the center line denotes median, box edges encompass 25th to 75th percentiles, min to max points). n = 4, paired two-tailed t-test. b, n = 3; ratio paired two-tailed t-test. c, Relative expression level of Egr1 and Egr3 (as determined by qPCR) in DMSO (n = 4) and flavopiridol (n = 3)-treated macrophages incubated with medium alone, supernatant from live Jurkat cells, and supernatant from apoptotic Jurkat cells for 30 min. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired two-tailed t-test. d, e, Relative expression of Egr1 (n = 7) and Egr3 (n = 5) in CytoD (actin polymerization inhibitor)-treated macrophages with and without apoptotic cells (d) and DMSO or BMS (pan-TAM inhibitor) during efferocytosis (e). Paired two-tailed t-test. f, Relative expression of Egr3 in macrophages treated with either IgG (antibody control) or Axl and MerTK (20 nM) activating antibodies for 30 min. n:3, unpaired two-tailed t-test. In all figures, data points represent individual values for ‘n’ biologically independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Schematics in b,e,f created with BioRender.com.
Fig. 1 |
Fig. 1 |. Transcriptional pause/release contributes to efferocytosis.
a, Schematic for PRO-seq of mouse macrophages engulfing apoptotic human Jurkat cells. b, Nascent transcripts (DESeq2 and Wald test) in macrophages after 45 min or 90 min of efferocytosis. Adjusted P < 0.001; upregulated genes > twofold change; downregulated genes < 0.5-fold change. c, Heat map depicting PRO-seq reads in resting macrophages ranked according to the pausing index (PI). Data in b and c are from four independent replicates. d, Jurkat cell engulfment by macrophages treated with DMSO or CDK9 inhibitor. n = 3 independent experiments. e, Apoptotic mouse thymocyte uptake by in vivo peritoneal macrophages (pMACs) treated with DMSO (left n = 4, right n = 3 mice) or the CDK9 inhibitor flavopiridol (n = 4 mice) or atuveciclib (n = 3 mice). f, Efferocytosis by macrophages treated with CDK9 inhibitors. PROTAC-CDK9 n = 5, THAL-SNS-032 n = 4, NVP-2 n = 8 independent experiments. g, Efferocytosis by human macrophages treated with flavopiridol or PROTAC-CDK9 (n = 4 and 3 human donors, respectively). h, Left, in vitro kinetics of efferocytosis and Fc receptor-mediated phagocytosis by macrophages fed apoptotic (pHrodo Green) or opsonized (pHrodo-iFL) thymocytes. Data are from three independent experiments. Right, in vivo Fc receptor-mediated phagocytosis by peritoneal macrophages treated with DMSO or flavopirido (right). n = 3 mice. i,j, Phagocytosis of live yeast, S. cerevisiae (i), or live bacteria, S. auerus (j), by macrophages treated with DMSO or flavopiridol. n = 12 (i) and n = 3 (j) independent experiments. Data are mean ± s.d. (e,h,j) or mean ± s.e.m. (h). In box and whisker plots, the centre line denotes the median, box edges denote 25th to 75th percentiles, spanning minimum to maximum points, and dots show independent data points. Some control samples in d and g were concurrently used in parallel experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001, by paired (d,e,g,h,right,j) or unpaired (f,i) Student’s two-tailed t-test, or by two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test (h,left). NS, not significant; Schematics in a,d,e,gj created with BioRender.com.
Fig. 2 |
Fig. 2 |. Importance of Pol II pause/release in continuous efferocytosis and corpse acidification.
a, First-round and continuous (second-round) efferocytosis by macrophages treated with DMSO or flavopiridol. Box and whisker plots as in Fig. 1. b, Representative images showing kinetics of efferocytosis of DMSO, or flavopiridol-treated bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) fed apoptotic LR73 cells assessed via live-cell imaging. Macrophages with more than two corpses are plotted. n = 34 (DMSO) and n = 50 (flavopiridol) macrophages from two independent experiments. Arrows denote internalized corpses. Scale bars, 20 μm c, Pausing indices of 27 endosomal rapidly regulated genes (DESeq2 and Wald test) in macrophages after 45 min efferocytosis. Rab29 PRO-seq tracks in resting and efferocytic macrophages (45 min, 90 min, from four independent experimental replicates). d, Schematic of CharOFF. e, Apoptotic CharOFF-expressing cells showing RFP and annexin V signals. f, RFP and GFP signals quantified in macrophages after efferocytosis of CharOFF-expressing targets. RFP signal remains, while the GFP signal is quenched after engulfment. Acidification or GFP quenching was inhibited by bafilomycin A1. g, GFP-negative (unacidified corpses) in RFP-positive (engulfed corpse) macrophages after treatment with CDK9 inhibitors during efferocytosis of apoptotic CharOFF cells. n = 4 independent experiments. Control samples were concurrently used in parallel experiments. h, Representative images of live-cell imaging over time of CharOFF-expressing corpse processing in BMDMs treated with DMSO or CDK9 inhibitors. A total of 63 (DMSO) and 58 (flavopiridol) macrophages were tracked from two independent experiments. Arrows indicate internalized corpses. AC, apoptotic cells; Mø, macrophages. i, Violin plot of individual macrophages from two independent experiments showing quantification of the time after ingestion at which GFP was quenched. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001, unpaired two-tailed t-test (a) or paired two-tailed t-test (c,g). t, time of ingestion. Schematics in a,d,g created with BioRender.com.
Fig. 3 |
Fig. 3 |. Rapid transcriptional upregulation of specific genes during efferocytosis links to pause/release.
a, Schematic for RNA-seq analysis of Hoxb8-derived macrophages engulfing apoptotic Jurkat cells. b, Principal component analysis of the RNA-seq data from macrophages alone and macrophages after 45, 90 and 180 min of efferocytosis. c, Pausing indices (per PRO-seq analysis) were calculated for the 49 upregulated genes in RNA-seq analysis (45 min efferocytosis point) compared to resting macrophages. The numbers of highly paused (pausing index greater than 4) and lowly paused (pausing index less than 4) genes are shown. NA, pausing index cannot be determined. d, Heat map of differentially upregulated genes (per DESeq2 and Wald test, corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini and Hochberg method) after 45 min efferocytosis compared to resting macrophages, adjusted P < 0.05 and a log2-transformed fold change > 0.5. bd, Data are from four independent replicates. e, Left, heat map of select upregulated genes (from RNA-seq) highlighting changes over time. Right, relative expression (from qPCR) of the indicated genes over time in macrophages during efferocytosis of apoptotic Jurkat cell. Data are from four (or five (Egr1 and Egr3)) independent experiments. f,g, Immunoblots for EGR1 and EGR3 in untreated (f) and cycloheximide (translation inhibitor)-treated (g) macrophages after 15 min phagocytosis of PtdSer+ RBCs. n = 3 independent experiments. h,i, Relative expression of Egr1 and Egr3, as determined by qPCR (h) and immunoblotting (i) in DMSO- and flavopiridol (FP)-treated macrophages during efferocytosis of apoptotic Jurkat cells (h) and phagocytosis of PtdSer+ RBCs (i). n = 3 independent experiments. Data in e and h are mean ± s.e.m. **P < 0.01, by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. Min., minimum; max., maximum. Schematics in a,c,f created with BioRender.com.
Fig. 4 |
Fig. 4 |. Pause/release-regulated transcription factor EGR3 affects corpse processing in vitro and in vivo.
a, In vivo efferocytosis of peritoneal macrophage 30 min after intraperitoneal injection of CypHer5E-stained apoptotic thymocytes in wild-type (WT; n = 4) and Egr3-knockout (KO; n = 6) mice. b,c, In vitro efferocytosis of CypHer5E-stained apoptotic Jurkat cells by wild-type and Egr3-deficient (shEgr3; b) or Egr3-overexpressing (Egr3-OE; c) macrophages. Data are from six independent experiments. d, Schematic for generation and analysis of egr3 CRISPANT zebrafish embryos. e, Representative dorsal images of wild-type (N = 9 (embryo number), n = 145 (microglial cells imaged)) and egr3 CRISPANT (N = 10, n = 151) brains 3 days postfertilization (dpf) (e). Microglia are labelled green (Tg(mpeg1:GFP-caax)) and neurons labelled red (Tg(NBT:dsRed)). Scale bars, 100 μm and 10 μm (inset). Arrowheads denote microglia containing engulfed neurons (dsRed+ vesicles. f, Quantification of microglia containing dsRed+ vesicles. g, Percentage of microglia with more or less than one dsRed+ vesicle. h, Heat maps of differentially regulated chromatin regions (per Wald test) and differentially regulated genes (per Wald test, adjusted P < 0.05) containing EGR3 motifs (identified by ATAC-seq, middle) in resting macrophages and macrophages at the indicated time points during efferocytosis (right). Data are from four independent replicates. i, Relative expression (per qPCR) of EGR3-regulated genes in wild-type and Egr3-overexpressed macrophages. n = 4 (endosomal/lysosomal genes) and n = 3 (cytoskeletal genes, except Elmo1, in which n = 5) independent experiments. j, ATAC-seq tracks showing the promoter regions of Dmxl2 and Elmo1 with the EGR3 motif. k, First-round and second-round efferocytosis by macrophages transfected with siRNAs targeting control, Dmxl2 or Elmo1 (siControl, siDmxl2 or siElmo1, respectively). n = 10 independent experiments. Box and whiskers plots as in Fig. 1. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001, by unpaired (a,i) or paired (b,k) two-tailed Student’s t-test. Schematics in a,d,h created with BioRender.com.

References

    1. Morioka S, Maueröder C & Ravichandran KS Living on the edge: efferocytosis at the interface of homeostasis and pathology. Immunity 50, 1149–1162 (2019). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muse GW et al. RNA polymerase is poised for activation across the genome. Nat. Genet. 39, 1507–1511 (2007). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chawla A et al. A PPARy-LXR-ABCA1 pathway in macrophages is involved in cholesterol efflux and atherogenesis. Mol. Cell 7, 161–171 (2001). - PubMed
    1. Czimmerer Z & Nagy L Epigenomic regulation of macrophage polarization: where do the nuclear receptors belong? Immunol. Rev. 317, 152–165 (2023). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boada-Romero E, Martinez J, Heckmann BL & Green DR The clearance of dead cells by efferocytosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 398–414 (2020). - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms