Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 29:7:100189.
doi: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2024.100189. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Efficacy of rifampicin combination therapy against MRSA prosthetic vascular graft infections in a rat model

Affiliations

Efficacy of rifampicin combination therapy against MRSA prosthetic vascular graft infections in a rat model

Mikkel Illemann Johansen et al. Biofilm. .

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of prosthetic vascular graft or endograft infections (VGEIs) and the optimal choice of antibiotics is unclear. We investigated various antibiotic choices as either monotherapy or combination therapy with rifampicin against MRSA in vitro and in vivo. Fosfomycin, daptomycin and vancomycin alone or in combination with rifampicin was used against MRSA USA300 FPR3757. Each antibiotic was tested for synergism or antagonism with rifampicin in vitro, and all antibiotic regimens were tested against actively growing bacteria in media and non-growing bacteria in buffer, both as planktonic cells and in biofilms. A rat model of VGEI was used to quantify the therapeutic efficacy of antibiotics in vivo by measuring bacterial load on grafts and in spleen, liver and kidneys. In vitro, rifampicin combinations did not reveal any synergism or antagonism in relation to growth inhibition. However, quantification of bactericidal activity revealed a strong antagonistic effect, both on biofilms and planktonic cells. This effect was only observed when treating active bacteria, as all antibiotics had little or no effect on inactive cells. Only daptomycin showed some biocidal activity against inactive cells. In vivo evaluation of therapy against VGEI contrasted the in vitro results. Rifampicin significantly increased the efficacy of both daptomycin and vancomycin. The combination of daptomycin and rifampicin was by far the most effective, curing 8 of 13 infected animals. Our study demonstrates that daptomycin in combination with rifampicin shows promising potential against VGEI caused by MRSA. Furthermore, we show how in vitro evaluation of antibiotic combinations in laboratory media does not predict their therapeutic effect against VGEI in vivo, presumably due to a difference in the metabolic state of the bacteria.

Keywords: Biofilm; Infections; MRSA; Persister cells; Prosthesis; Rat model; Rifampicin; Staphylococcus aureus; VGEI; Vascular graft or endograft infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Rikke Louise Meyer reports financial support was provided by 10.13039/501100009708Novo Nordisk Foundation. Lars Østergaard reports financial support was provided by 10.13039/501100009708Novo Nordisk Foundation. Nis Pedersen Jørgensen reports financial support was provided by 10.13039/501100007438The Hede Nielsen Family Foundation. The corresponding author Rikke Louise Meyer is an editor for Biofilms. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Active and inactive populations of MRSA (planktonic and biofilms) treated with antibiotic monotherapy or in combination with rifampicin. 24 h treatment of planktonic cells (A, B, C, D, E, F) or biofilms (G, H), treated with daptomycin, fosfomycin, or vancomycin as mono-therapy or in combination with rifampicin (10 mg/l). For planktonic cultures, the change in CFU during the incubation is displayed. For biofilms, the absolute values of surviving bacteria is shown. Symbols with an “ × ” denote that this sample had no visible survival and the value is under the limit of detection (LOD). Statistical tests compare treated samples with untreated controls, and mono-vs. combination therapy. n = 3–4 (one-way ANOVA, ns: p > 0.05, *p = 0.0217–0.0435, **p = 0.003–0.0079, ***p = 0.0005, ****p < 0.0001) (Mann-Whitney test, $p = 0.0286).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bacterial load on vascular grafts following 7 days of antibiotic treatment. Each data point represents the median log 10 CFU/ml of triplicates from one graft. The asterisks represent pairwise comparison of each monotherapy with combination therapy with rifampicin (Fisher’s exact test ns: p > 0.05, **p ≤ 0.005). NaCl = Control, DAP = Daptomycin, RIF = Rifampicin, FOS = Fosfomycin, VAN = Vancomycin.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Bacterial load in organs following 7 days of treatment. Each data point represents median log 10 CFU/ml with interquartile range from triplicates of homogenate of (A) liver (B) left and right kidney (C) spleen. The asterisks represent pairwise comparison of each monotherapy with combination therapy with rifampicin (Mann-Whitney test *p ≤ 0.05). NaCl=Control, DAP = Daptomycin, RIF = Rifampicin, FOS = Fosfomycin, VAN = Vancomycin.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cumulated cure rate of graft and organs. Each column represents percent of animals with no growth of bacteria from graft and organs (liver, kidney and spleen). NaCl = Control, DAP = Daptomycin, RIF = Rifampicin, FOS = Fosfomycin, VAN = Vancomycin. Asterisks represent pairwise comparison of monotherapy with combination therapy with rifampicin (Fisher’s exact test *p ≤ 0.05).

References

    1. Sixt T., et al. Long-term prognosis following vascular graft infection: a 10-year cohort study. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;9:ofac054. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac054. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Legout L., et al. Characteristics and prognosis in patients with prosthetic vascular graft infection: a prospective observational cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:352–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03618.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. 's choice - European society for vascular surgery (ESVS) 2020 clinical practice guidelines on the management of vascular graft and endograft infections. Chakfé N., et al., editors. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59:339–384. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.10.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anagnostopoulos A., et al. Inadequate perioperative prophylaxis and postsurgical complications after graft implantation are important risk factors for subsequent vascular graft infections: prospective results from the vascular graft infection cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69:621–630. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy956. - DOI - PubMed
    1. FitzGerald S.F., Kelly C., Humphreys H. Diagnosis and treatment of prosthetic aortic graft infections: confusion and inconsistency in the absence of evidence or consensus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56:996–999. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki382. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources