Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 23;6(1):100317.
doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100317. eCollection 2024 Mar.

A Preliminary Comparison of the Katrak Hand Movement Scale With the Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer Assessment Shows a Strong Correlation After Stroke

Ann Winkler  1   2 , Paul Sunderland  3 , Brendan Major  4 , Natasha A Lannin  4   5
Affiliations

A Preliminary Comparison of the Katrak Hand Movement Scale With the Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer Assessment Shows a Strong Correlation After Stroke

Ann Winkler et al. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the concurrent validity of the KHMS with the FMA-UE.

Design: The FMA-UE and the KHMS were administered to 50 adults with stroke to evaluate their concurrent validity.

Setting: Three tertiary rehabilitation hospitals.

Participants: Participants were aged ≥18 years, receiving stroke or rehabilitation services from a participating hospital, and had a confirmed diagnosis of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) with upper limb involvement. Fifty patients were recruited to the study (20 women, 30 men, N=50) with a mean age of 71 (SD 13.4, range 35-90) years. Time since stroke varied from 2 days to 187 months, with a median of 0.8 months.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Concurrent validity of the KHMS with the FMA-UE.

Results: A correlation of r=0.948 was found between the 2 scales (P=.0001). Moderate floor effects were noted in our sample (16%); however, significant ceiling effects were recorded (44%).

Conclusion: The KHMS demonstrated a statistically strong correlation with the FMA-UE and holds promise for use, particularly in the clinical setting, to evaluate upper limb motor impairment after stroke.

Keywords: Disability evaluation; Functional status; Neuroscience; Rehabilitation; Stroke, Stroke rehabilitation; Upper extremity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Katrak Hand Movement Scale. Reprinted from Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 79, Katrak et al, Predicting upper limb recovery after stroke: the place of early shoulder and hand movement, 758-761, Copyright (1998), with permission from Elsevier.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Alt Murphy M, Resteghini C, Feys P, Lamers I. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simpson LA, Eng JJ. Functional recovery following stroke: capturing changes in upper-extremity function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27:240–250. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lannin N. Reliability, validity and factor structure of the upper limb subscale of the Motor Assessment Scale (UL-MAS) in adults following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:109–116. - PubMed
    1. Kim H, Her J, Ko J, et al. Reliability, concurrent validity, and responsiveness of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) for hemiplegic patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2012;24:893–899.
    1. Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, et al. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2009;89:840–850. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources