Differences in the choice of beef artificial insemination sires used by dairy producers versus beef producers

Abstract

The growing demand among dairy producers for suitable beef sires to mate to their females creates the possibility of separate breeding programs to generate beef sires for the dairy sector versus those for the beef sector. Informing such a decision is the extent of the genetic differences among beef sires used by dairy producers relative to those used by beef producers. The objective therefore of the present study was to use a large national database of artificial insemination (AI) records in dairy and beef cow herds to establish the difference in mean genetic merit of beef AI sires used by dairy producers versus those used by cow-calf beef producers. The traits explored were gestation length, calving difficulty, and perinatal mortality as well as the 3 carcass traits of carcass weight, conformation, and fat score. Carcass conformation and fat score are mechanically assessed on a scale of 1 (poor conformation and low fat cover) to 15 (excellent conformation and high fat cover). Sire genetic merit differences for feed intake and docility were also examined. Estimates of genetic merit for all 8 traits on individual AI sires available at the time of service were used. A total of 1,230,622 AI records comprised 909,719 services from dairy herds and 320,903 services from beef herds were used. Of the 1,802 beef AI sires represented in the entire dataset, over half were used by both dairy and beef herds representing ≥98% of the services in each production system. However, the usage rate of individual AI sires differed between dairy and beef herds with the Spearman rank correlation between the quantity of inseminations per sire in dairy and beef herds being just 0.38. This correlation means that beef AI sires used heavily in the beef herd were not always those heavily used in dairy herds. A clear difference in the mean genetic merit of beef AI sires selected by dairy producers relative to those selected by beef cow-calf producers was obvious with the extent of the difference being a function of whether the female served was a nulliparous heifer or a cow. Much of the differences in genetic merit of chosen beef AI sires between dairy and beef producers was actually attributable to differences in breed choice, albeit some within-breed selection was also evident. Irrespective, dairy producers, on average, chose shorter gestation length sires whose progeny were genetically less predisposed to require intervention during the birthing process; these sires had genetic merit estimates expected to result in lighter and less conformed progeny carcasses relative to the beef AI sires used by beef producers. Results point to large differences in genetic merit of the beef AI sires chosen by dairy versus beef producers, much of which actually reflected differences in breed choice among dairy and beef producers.

Summary Beef sires used by dairy producers differ from those used by beef producers, but information on the extent of this difference per trait is lacking. Using a large national database of artificial insemination (AI) records from dairy and beef cattle, this study demonstrated that relative to beef producers, dairy producers use, on average, beef AI sires that are expected to produce shorter-gestation progeny requiring less intervention at birth. The genetic merit of these beef AI sires, however, resulted in progeny with lighter and less conformed carcasses relative to the progeny of beef AI sires used by beef producers.