Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun;104(8):4485-4497.
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.13460. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

A case of transdisciplinarity and collaborative decision making: the co-construction of Gendered Food Product Profiles

Lora Forsythe #  1 , Olamide Olaosebikan #  2 , Béla Teeken #  2 , Gérard Ngoh Newilah  3 , Sarah Mayanja #  4 , Ann Ritah Nanyonjo #  5 , Paula Iragaba #  5 , Benjamin Okoye  6 , Pricilla Marimo  7 , Akankwasa Kenneth  8 , Laurent Adinsi  9 , Cedric Kendine Vepowo  3 , Adetonah Sounkoura  10 , Samuel Edgar Tinyiro  8 , Alexandre Bouniol  9   11   12 , Dominique Dufour  12   13 , Noel Akissoé  9 , Tessy Madu  6
Affiliations
Review

A case of transdisciplinarity and collaborative decision making: the co-construction of Gendered Food Product Profiles

Lora Forsythe et al. J Sci Food Agric. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Crop breeding in sub-Saharan Africa has made considerable gains; however, postharvest and food-related preferences have been overlooked, in addition to how these preferences vary by gender, social difference and context. This context is changing as participatory approaches using intersectional gender and place-based methods are beginning to inform how breeding programmes make decisions. This article presents an innovative methodology to inclusively and democratically prioritise food quality traits of root, tuber and banana crops based on engagement with food systems actors and transdisciplinary collaboration. The outcome of the methodology is the Gendered Food Product Profile (GFPP) - a list of prioritised food quality characteristics - to support breeders to make more socially inclusive decisions on the methods for trait characterisation to select genotypes closer to the needs of food system actors. This article reviews application of the methodology in 14 GFPPs, presents illustrative case studies and lessons learned. Key lessons are that the transdisciplinary structure and the key role of social scientists helped avoid reductionism, supported co-learning, and the creation of GFPPs that represented the diverse interests of food system actors, particularly women, in situ. The method partially addressed power dynamics in multidisciplinary decision making; however, effectiveness was dependent on equitable team relations and supportive institutions committed to valuing plural forms of knowledge. Actions to address power asymmetries that privilege particular types of knowledge and voices in decision making are crucial in techno-science projects, along with opportunities for co-learning and long-term collaboration and a transdisciplinary structure at higher level. © 2024 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Keywords: breeding; crop users' preferences; food product profile; gender; root, tuber and banana (RTB)‐based food.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Walker TS and Alwang J eds, Crop Improvement, Adoption, and Impact of Improved Varieties in Food Crops in Sub‐Saharan Africa. CABI, Wallingford, UK (2015) https://iaes.cgiar.org/spia/publications/crop-improvement-adoption-and-i....
    1. Alene AD, Abdoulaye T, Rusike J, Manyong V and Walker TS, The effectiveness of crop improvement programmes from the perspectives of varietal output and adoption: cassava, cowpea, soybean and yam in sub‐Saharan Africa and maize in west and Central Africa, in Crop Improvement, Adoption and Impact of Improved Varieties in Food Crops in Sub‐Saharan Africa, ed. by Walker TS and Alwang J. CABI, Oxfordshire, UK, pp. 74–122 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780644011.0074.
    1. Ewell H, Breeding for impact: perspectives on gender‐responsive cassava breeding in Nigeria. Journal of Gender, Technology and Development 25:217–232 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2021.1939962.
    1. Polar V, Mohan RR, McDougall C, Teeken B, Mulema AA, Marimo P et al., Examining choice to advance gender equality in breeding research. In Advancing gender equality through agricultural and environmental research: Past, present, and future, eds. Rhiannon Pyburn, and Anouka van Eerdewijk. Chapter 2, Pp. 77–111. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) (2021). https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896293915_02.
    1. Forsythe L, Tufan H, Bouniol A, Kleih U and Fliedel G, An interdisciplinary and participatory methodology to improve user acceptability of root, tuber and banana varieties through development of food product profiles quality characteristics. Int J Food Sci Technol 56:1115–1123 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.14680.