Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;47(4):453-461.
doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03633-5. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoablation of Endophytic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Affiliations

Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoablation of Endophytic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Christian Greve Jensen et al. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Endophytic renal cancer treatment is a challenge. Due to difficulties in endophytic tumor visualization during surgical extirpation, image-guided percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) is an attractive alternative. The minimally invasive nature of PCA makes it favorable for comorbid patients as well as patients in which surgery is contraindicated. Oncological outcomes and complications after PCA of endophytic biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were reviewed in this study.

Materials and methods: Patients were included after a multidisciplinary team conference from January 2015 to November 2021. Inclusion criteria were endophytic biopsy-proven T1 RCC treated with PCA with one year of follow-up. Complications were reported according to the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) classification system and the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) system. Major complications were defined as a grade ≥ 3 according to the CDC.

Results: Fifty-six patients were included with a total of 56 endophytic tumors treated during 61 PCA sessions. The median RENAL nephrometry score was 9 (IQR 2), and the mean tumor size was 25.7 mm (SD ± 8.9 mm). Mean hospitalization time was 0.39 (SD ± 1.1) days. At a mean follow-up of 996 days (SD ± 559), 86% of tumors were recurrence free after one PCA. No patients progressed to metastatic disease. According to the CIRSE classification, 10.7% (n = 6) had grade 3 complications, and 5.4% (n = 3) had CDC major complications.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that PCA of endophytic biopsy-proven T1 RCC is safe with few major complications and excellent local tumor control rates at almost three-year mean follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3: Retrospective cohort study.

Keywords: Ablation; Cryoablation; Endophytic tumor; PCA; Percutaneous; RCC; Renal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Christian Greve Jensen, Marco Dybdahl, John Valtersson, Bo Redder Mussmann, Lars Lund, and Brian Welch have no conflict of interest. Louise Duus has received grant from Boehringer Ingelheim for attending the European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI) Winter course 2022. Theresa Junker has received research grant from Boston Scientific. Pia Iben Pietersen has received grant from Boehringer Ingelheim for attending the European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI) Winter course 2022. Ole Graumann has received speaker honoraria from Advisory Board member and received research grant from Boston Scientific.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart showing patient selection. aPercutaneous cryoablation (PCA). bRadius–endophytic–nearness–anterior–location (RENAL). cRenal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative incidence estimates of local tumor progression
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CT images from a 62-year-old male patient with a 38-mm endophytic biopsy-proven clear cell RCC in the left kidney where PCA was performed. A Preprocedural CT images with intravenous contrast, venous phase. The tumor is marked with a white circle. B Intraprocedural CT images with the patient in an oblique position. The image demonstrates the iceball zone. C Venous contrast CT imaging one year after primary PCA shows no residual tumor mass. The ablation zone is marked with a white circle. aComputed tomography (CT). bRenal cell carcinoma (RCC).cPercutaneous cryoablation (PCA)

References

    1. Sung WW, Ko PY, Chen WJ, Wang SC, Chen SL. Trends in the kidney cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios according to health care expenditures of 56 countries. Sci Rep. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79367-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, Hollenbeck BK. Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj362. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, Bedke J, Capitanio U, Dabestani S, et al. European association of urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2022 update. Eur Urol. 2022;75(5):799–810. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Junker T, Duus L, Rasmussen BSB, Azawi N, Lund L, Norgaard B, et al. Partial nephrectomy versus percutaneous cryoablation of small renal cell carcinomas: a comparison of complications in a prospective multicenter cohort study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.07.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duus LA, Junker T, Rasmussen BS, Bojsen JA, Pedersen AL, Anthonsen A, et al. Safety, efficacy, and mid-term oncological outcomes of computed tomography-guided cryoablation of T1 renal cancer. Acta Radiol. 2022 doi: 10.1177/02841851221081825. - DOI - PubMed