Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar-Apr;31(2):57-62.
doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000774.

So You Want to Do Trauma Research? A Practical Guide to Creating a Research Program at Your Home Institution

Affiliations

So You Want to Do Trauma Research? A Practical Guide to Creating a Research Program at Your Home Institution

Nicholas J Larson et al. J Trauma Nurs. 2024 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Background: There are 3 pillars upon which the foundation of a teaching program in health care is founded: research, education, and clinical care. However, in a busy academic trauma practice, the unfortunate reality is that research is often a low priority in the frenzy of mandates for clinical productivity.

Objective: The purpose of this report is to advise hospitals on how to create a modest trauma research program that supports research interests without significantly impacting the overall clinical productivity of the department.

Methods: Relevant literature related to the development of an academic trauma research department was reviewed. Relevant articles were then compared to this manuscript to assess the novelty of the topic.

Results: There are 4 essential components of a trauma research program: (1) a zealot, (2) institutional commitment and support, (3) a statistician, and (4) registry data access.

Conclusion: The creation of a trauma research program may seem like a herculean effort, but this work is necessary for institutions hoping to achieve status as a Level I/II trauma center. Following the steps outlined in this report, trauma providers can create a robust research program at their institution without sacrificing clinical productivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Andrade C. (2014). Cause versus association in observational studies in psychopharmacology. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 75(8), e781–e784. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.14f09362 - DOI
    1. Clair J. S. (2005, February). Table 1, AHRQ scale of research grades and levels [Text]. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20542/table/A5857/
    1. Grady C. (2015). Institutional review boards. Chest, 148(5), 1148–1155. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.15-0706 - DOI
    1. Hariton E., Locascio J. J. (2018). Randomised controlled trials—The gold standard for effectiveness research. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 125(13), 1716. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15199 - DOI
    1. Khin-Maung-Gyi F. (2009). The history and role of institutional review boards: Local and central IRBs, a single mission. AMA Journal of Ethics, 11(4), 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2009.11.4.pfor1-0904 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources